Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative sensory testing for detecting small fiber impairment in polyneuropathy and diagnosing small fiber neuropathy

This cross-sectional retrospective study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of cold detection thresholds (CDT) and warm detection thresholds (WDT), measured by quantitative sensory testing, for detecting small fiber impairment in polyneuropathy and diagnosing small fiber neuropathy (SFN). A total of 384 individuals with distally distributed sensory disturbances were included. Using ACTTION criteria, 138 patients with polyneuropathy were identified. Among them, 36 were diagnosed with SFN, 91 with mixed fiber polyneuropathy, and 11 with pure large fiber polyneuropathy. First, we assessed CDT and WDT accuracy, both individually and combined (ie, an abnormal value in either CDT or WDT), in detecting small fiber impairment in polyneuropathy. Next, we calculated CDT and WDT diagnostic accuracy for SFN, both alone and combined, and evaluated their accuracy when integrated with small fiber-related clinical abnormalities. Isolated abnormalities in CDT or WDT showed relatively low diagnostic accuracy. However, combined abnormalities achieved a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 70% for detecting small fiber impairment in distal symmetric polyneuropathy. For SFN diagnosis, combining CDT and WDT yielded 78% sensitivity, 70% specificity, and a 94% negative predictive value. These metrics improved to 78% sensitivity and 100% specificity when CDT or WDT were integrated with small-fiber-related clinical abnormalities. Although individual CDT and WDT assessments offer limited diagnostic accuracy, their combination provides a practical, noninvasive approach for screening small fiber impairment in distal symmetric polyneuropathy and diagnosing SFN. This strategy may reduce the need for more invasive and less cost-effective procedures, like skin biopsy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003685
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative sensory testing for detecting small fiber impairment in polyneuropathy and diagnosing small fiber neuropathy

Caterina Leone, Daniel Litewczuk, Andrea Truini, Giulia Di Stefano et al.
5 citations
Pain
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
5.82
article

Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative sensory testing for detecting small fiber impairment in polyneuropathy and diagnosing small fiber neuropathy

Caterina Leone, Daniel Litewczuk, Andrea Truini, Giulia Di Stefano, Ralf Baron, Gianfranco De Stefano, Nanna Brix Finnerup, Juliane Sachau, Giuseppe Di Pietro, Nicoletta Esposito, Eleonora Galosi, Pietro Falco, Enrico Evangelisti
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This cross-sectional retrospective study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of cold detection thresholds (CDT) and warm detection thresholds (WDT), measured by quantitative sensory testing, for detecting small fiber impairment in polyneuropathy and diagnosing small fiber neuropathy (SFN). A total of 384 individuals with distally distributed sensory disturbances were included. Using ACTTION criteria, 138 patients with polyneuropathy were identified. Among them, 36 were diagnosed with SFN, 91 with mixed fiber polyneuropathy, and 11 with pure large fiber polyneuropathy. First, we assessed CDT and WDT accuracy, both individually and combined (ie, an abnormal value in either CDT or WDT), in detecting small fiber impairment in polyneuropathy. Next, we calculated CDT and WDT diagnostic accuracy for SFN, both alone and combined, and evaluated their accuracy when integrated with small fiber-related clinical abnormalities. Isolated abnormalities in CDT or WDT showed relatively low diagnostic accuracy. However, combined abnormalities achieved a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 70% for detecting small fiber impairment in distal symmetric polyneuropathy. For SFN diagnosis, combining CDT and WDT yielded 78% sensitivity, 70% specificity, and a 94% negative predictive value. These metrics improved to 78% sensitivity and 100% specificity when CDT or WDT were integrated with small-fiber-related clinical abnormalities. Although individual CDT and WDT assessments offer limited diagnostic accuracy, their combination provides a practical, noninvasive approach for screening small fiber impairment in distal symmetric polyneuropathy and diagnosing SFN. This strategy may reduce the need for more invasive and less cost-effective procedures, like skin biopsy.

PainVol. 166(10)
Aarhus University Hospital (DK), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Danish Pain Research Center (DK), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Lübeck (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
5.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.