Strategically identifying optimal locations for multifunctional green infrastructure: A case study in the Taipei Basin

Climate change has given rise to a multitude of challenges for both society and the environment. Implementing green infrastructure (GI) is regarded as a crucial policy strategy to mitigate these impacts. Numerous studies have been conducted to find optimal locations for implementing GI; however, selecting the most suitable context-specific strategy remains challenging. To address this gap, spatial multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) and unsupervised machine learning clustering are integrated to identify the areas requiring green infrastructure intervention and provide planning suggestions for the Taipei Basin. We evaluated eight ecosystem services provided by GI, including agricultural production, carbon sequestration, heat reduction, stormwater management, water purification, habitat enhancement, green connectivity and green accessibility on 25 m 2 grids. The SMCE results indicate that green infrastructure development should primarily focus on the central region of the Taipei Basin, while peri-urban areas are of lower priority. Based on the outcomes of the clustering analysis, specific and context-appropriate strategies for GI planning are recommended for each cluster. Integrating the priority map with cluster analysis offers valuable insights for decision-makers to pinpoint urgent challenges, target synergistic ecosystem services, and identify priority siting for GI. These findings support the formulation of strategic plans for GI development. • The spatial distribution of eight ecosystem services provided by GI is identified. • The GI priority map highlights priority areas for GI development. • Specific GI strategies are proposed to address the issues faced by different areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Use Policy
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107654
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategically identifying optimal locations for multifunctional green infrastructure: A case study in the Taipei Basin

Zih-Hong Lin, Shawn W. Laffan, Graciela Metternicht
1 citations
Land Use Policy
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

Strategically identifying optimal locations for multifunctional green infrastructure: A case study in the Taipei Basin

Zih-Hong Lin, Shawn W. Laffan, Graciela Metternicht
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Climate change has given rise to a multitude of challenges for both society and the environment. Implementing green infrastructure (GI) is regarded as a crucial policy strategy to mitigate these impacts. Numerous studies have been conducted to find optimal locations for implementing GI; however, selecting the most suitable context-specific strategy remains challenging. To address this gap, spatial multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) and unsupervised machine learning clustering are integrated to identify the areas requiring green infrastructure intervention and provide planning suggestions for the Taipei Basin. We evaluated eight ecosystem services provided by GI, including agricultural production, carbon sequestration, heat reduction, stormwater management, water purification, habitat enhancement, green connectivity and green accessibility on 25 m 2 grids. The SMCE results indicate that green infrastructure development should primarily focus on the central region of the Taipei Basin, while peri-urban areas are of lower priority. Based on the outcomes of the clustering analysis, specific and context-appropriate strategies for GI planning are recommended for each cluster. Integrating the priority map with cluster analysis offers valuable insights for decision-makers to pinpoint urgent challenges, target synergistic ecosystem services, and identify priority siting for GI. These findings support the formulation of strategic plans for GI development. • The spatial distribution of eight ecosystem services provided by GI is identified. • The GI priority map highlights priority areas for GI development. • Specific GI strategies are proposed to address the issues faced by different areas.

Land Use PolicyVol. 157
UNSW Sydney (AU), Environmental Earth Sciences (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Ministry of Education, University of New South Wales
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.