Ecocide as a Separate Crime under the Rome Statute: A Legal Analysis of the Discourse

This article explores the evolving concept of ecocide within international criminal law, focusing on its normative development and potential deterrent function. Although not formally recognized under the Rome Statute, ecocide's growing presence in legal and political discourse reflects a broader shift in how environmental harm is conceptualized. The analysis considers national legislative efforts, ICC discourse, and complementary approaches such as transitional justice and symbolic legislation. It also highlights structural limitations, including enforcement gaps and the focus on individual responsibility. The article argues that ecocide, rather than being a fully codified crime, currently stands at a critical normative juncture shaped by legal experimentation, global advocacy, and expanding expectations of accountability in the face of ecological destruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Policy and Law
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18785395251351171
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecocide as a Separate Crime under the Rome Statute: A Legal Analysis of the Discourse

Cansu ATILGAN PAZVANTOĞLU
Environmental Policy and Law
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
article

Ecocide as a Separate Crime under the Rome Statute: A Legal Analysis of the Discourse

Cansu ATILGAN PAZVANTOĞLU
article en

Abstract

This article explores the evolving concept of ecocide within international criminal law, focusing on its normative development and potential deterrent function. Although not formally recognized under the Rome Statute, ecocide's growing presence in legal and political discourse reflects a broader shift in how environmental harm is conceptualized. The analysis considers national legislative efforts, ICC discourse, and complementary approaches such as transitional justice and symbolic legislation. It also highlights structural limitations, including enforcement gaps and the focus on individual responsibility. The article argues that ecocide, rather than being a fully codified crime, currently stands at a critical normative juncture shaped by legal experimentation, global advocacy, and expanding expectations of accountability in the face of ecological destruction.

Environmental Policy and LawVol. 55(2-3)
Eskişehir Osmangazi University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.