Quantifying the Impact of Lean Construction Practices on Sustainability Performance in Chinese EPC Projects: A PLS-SEM Approach
This study assesses the performance impact of lean construction practices in Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) projects in China. While lean methods have demonstrated substantial benefits in conventional construction, their implementation in the EPC context—characterized by higher complexity and integration—remains underexplored, particularly within the Chinese infrastructure sector. This research develops a structured framework that classifies lean practices into five functional categories: planning and scheduling (PS), process and workflow optimization (PWO), quality and safety enhancement (QSE), resource and maintenance (RM), and visualization and communication (VC). This study evaluates the influence of these practices on four key performance indicators: efficiency and resource management, quality and safety, stakeholder satisfaction, and organizational and market impact. Data were collected from 456 EPC stakeholders via a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings reveal that PS, PWO, and QSE exert the strongest positive effects on performance, while RM and VC contribute in more context-specific ways. The results highlight the value of lean practices for improving operational performance, stakeholder engagement, and sustainability in complex project delivery systems and underscore the need for policy support and digital integration to enhance lean adoption in Chinese EPC sector.
Authors
- Nor Kamaliana Khamis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6761-159X)
- Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7053-4396)
- D. Zhu
Institutions
- National University of Malaysia (MY)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sustainability
- Published
- 2025-06-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125665
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Construction Project Management and Performance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.43