Harnessing AI for content and strategies in instructional purposes: Limitations and red flags

This study examines the psychological effects of artificial intelligence (AI) in educational settings, with a particular focus on cognitive, behavioral, and social dimensions. Based on interviews with higher education instructors in Biliran Province, Philippines, the findings indicate that although AI tools ease cognitive load by automating repetitive tasks; however, they often lack the depth and contextual relevance necessary for specialized academic subjects. This shortfall may reduce cognitive engagement, as students could become overly dependent on AI-generated content, thereby weakening their critical thinking skills. Behaviorally, the shift toward AI reliance raises ethical concerns, as students are increasingly bypassing independent learning in favor of automated responses, thus threatening academic integrity. On a social level, AI affects student-instructor interactions and intensifies privacy concerns, with participants voicing apprehension about data security and AI-facilitated plagiarism. These findings highlight the importance of balanced AI integration—one that fosters cognitive engagement, upholds ethical academic behavior, and maintains authentic social interaction—to ensure responsible AI use in educational contexts.

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Social Psychology
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i5.3235
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harnessing AI for content and strategies in instructional purposes: Limitations and red flags

2 citations
Environment and Social Psychology
Online Learning and Analytics
3.39
article

Harnessing AI for content and strategies in instructional purposes: Limitations and red flags

article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study examines the psychological effects of artificial intelligence (AI) in educational settings, with a particular focus on cognitive, behavioral, and social dimensions. Based on interviews with higher education instructors in Biliran Province, Philippines, the findings indicate that although AI tools ease cognitive load by automating repetitive tasks; however, they often lack the depth and contextual relevance necessary for specialized academic subjects. This shortfall may reduce cognitive engagement, as students could become overly dependent on AI-generated content, thereby weakening their critical thinking skills. Behaviorally, the shift toward AI reliance raises ethical concerns, as students are increasingly bypassing independent learning in favor of automated responses, thus threatening academic integrity. On a social level, AI affects student-instructor interactions and intensifies privacy concerns, with participants voicing apprehension about data security and AI-facilitated plagiarism. These findings highlight the importance of balanced AI integration—one that fosters cognitive engagement, upholds ethical academic behavior, and maintains authentic social interaction—to ensure responsible AI use in educational contexts.

Environment and Social PsychologyVol. 10(5)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Online Learning and Analytics
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Harnessing AI for content and strategies in instructional purposes: Limitations and red flags · Environment and Social Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS