Predicting biodiversity loss in terrestrial vertebrates: A global analysis of Red List Index trends and key drivers (2002–2021)

The Red List Index (RLI) serves as a vital indicator of extinction risks, where a hypothetical value of 1 implies no species are threatened, and 0 implies all species have gone extinct. Despite its importance, no prior country-level studies have analyzed factors predicting RLI trends over time. This study employs mixed-effect regression models to examine extinction risk trends across 193 countries from 2002 to 2021, incorporating factors such as the year of publication of a country's National Biodiversity Strategic and Action Plan (NBSAP), indigenous land hold/use, globalization, GDP per capita, population density, World Bank region, and island status. Initial 2002 RLI values emerged as the most significant predictor of extinction risk trends, suggesting potential biodiversity degradation cascades. After adjusting for key covariates, a 10-year lagged NBSAP publication was linked to a modest reduction in the average annual RLI decline, from −0.013 to −0.012. Island nations are particularly vulnerable, with extinction risks increasing 2.6 times faster than in mainland countries. While population density and GDP per capita correlated negatively with RLI trends, indigenous land hold/use emerged as a significant positive factor. Globalization (a weighted social, economic, and political index) had a slightly positive impact for mainland countries but was substantially negative for islands, likely due to invasive species. If current trends persist, many countries could face near-total species extinction within 400 years. This research underscores the urgent need for comprehensive conservation efforts to protect the billions of years of evolutionary history at risk. • Extinction risks declined from −0.13 to −0.12 annually after NBSAP publication. • Per capita GDP ties to higher extinction risks, especially in South Asia. • Island nations' extinction risks accelerated 2.5 times faster than non-island states. • Globalization linked to drastically faster extinction risk acceleration on islands. • Indigenous land hold/use associated with lower extinction risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111316
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting biodiversity loss in terrestrial vertebrates: A global analysis of Red List Index trends and key drivers (2002–2021)

Amy Rogers
Biological Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Predicting biodiversity loss in terrestrial vertebrates: A global analysis of Red List Index trends and key drivers (2002–2021)

Amy Rogers
article en

Abstract

The Red List Index (RLI) serves as a vital indicator of extinction risks, where a hypothetical value of 1 implies no species are threatened, and 0 implies all species have gone extinct. Despite its importance, no prior country-level studies have analyzed factors predicting RLI trends over time. This study employs mixed-effect regression models to examine extinction risk trends across 193 countries from 2002 to 2021, incorporating factors such as the year of publication of a country's National Biodiversity Strategic and Action Plan (NBSAP), indigenous land hold/use, globalization, GDP per capita, population density, World Bank region, and island status. Initial 2002 RLI values emerged as the most significant predictor of extinction risk trends, suggesting potential biodiversity degradation cascades. After adjusting for key covariates, a 10-year lagged NBSAP publication was linked to a modest reduction in the average annual RLI decline, from −0.013 to −0.012. Island nations are particularly vulnerable, with extinction risks increasing 2.6 times faster than in mainland countries. While population density and GDP per capita correlated negatively with RLI trends, indigenous land hold/use emerged as a significant positive factor. Globalization (a weighted social, economic, and political index) had a slightly positive impact for mainland countries but was substantially negative for islands, likely due to invasive species. If current trends persist, many countries could face near-total species extinction within 400 years. This research underscores the urgent need for comprehensive conservation efforts to protect the billions of years of evolutionary history at risk. • Extinction risks declined from −0.13 to −0.12 annually after NBSAP publication. • Per capita GDP ties to higher extinction risks, especially in South Asia. • Island nations' extinction risks accelerated 2.5 times faster than non-island states. • Globalization linked to drastically faster extinction risk acceleration on islands. • Indigenous land hold/use associated with lower extinction risks.

Biological ConservationVol. 309
Kennedy Krieger Institute (US), Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.