Sustainable approaches for weed management in taro cultivation: Analysis using mixed‐effect model in diverse agroclimatic conditions

Abstract This study assessed the effectiveness of eight weed control treatments in improving taro ( Colocasia esculenta ) yield across 10 locations spanning seven agro‐climatic zones in India over two consecutive years (2021–2022 and 2022–2023). The experiment used a Randomised Complete Block Design (RCBD), with treatments including chemical herbicides (quizalofop‐ p ‐ethyl and glyphosate), hand weeding, intercropping with cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.), mulching, and an unweeded control. A linear mixed‐effects model was employed to evaluate treatment effects while accounting for site‐ and year‐related variability. The full model incorporated Treatment as a fixed effect, with Site, Year and Replications nested within Site × Year as random effects. A simplified model, excluding the Treatment:Site:Year interaction due to negligible variance contribution, was selected for inference. The analysis revealed significant treatment effects on yield. Mulching with ground cover mat (T5) and weed‐free control (T7) consistently resulted in the highest yields, while the unweeded control (T8) showed substantial yield reductions. Site emerged as the most influential factor in yield variability, highlighting the necessity of site‐specific weed management strategies. Model validation through residual diagnostics confirmed a robust model fit. These findings underscore the importance of environment‐specific and integrated weed management approaches for enhancing taro yield sustainability across diverse agro‐climatic conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weed Research
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.70026
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable approaches for weed management in taro cultivation: Analysis using mixed‐effect model in diverse agroclimatic conditions

Jitender Kumar, K. Mamatha, S. Sunitha, R. S. Singh et al.
Weed Research
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
article

Sustainable approaches for weed management in taro cultivation: Analysis using mixed‐effect model in diverse agroclimatic conditions

Jitender Kumar, K. Mamatha, S. Sunitha, R. S. Singh, V. Suresh, C. Thangamani, Manpreet Kour, S. Sengupta, R. Saravanan, Virendra Singh, S. J. Immamsaheb, T. Padmakshi
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study assessed the effectiveness of eight weed control treatments in improving taro ( Colocasia esculenta ) yield across 10 locations spanning seven agro‐climatic zones in India over two consecutive years (2021–2022 and 2022–2023). The experiment used a Randomised Complete Block Design (RCBD), with treatments including chemical herbicides (quizalofop‐ p ‐ethyl and glyphosate), hand weeding, intercropping with cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.), mulching, and an unweeded control. A linear mixed‐effects model was employed to evaluate treatment effects while accounting for site‐ and year‐related variability. The full model incorporated Treatment as a fixed effect, with Site, Year and Replications nested within Site × Year as random effects. A simplified model, excluding the Treatment:Site:Year interaction due to negligible variance contribution, was selected for inference. The analysis revealed significant treatment effects on yield. Mulching with ground cover mat (T5) and weed‐free control (T7) consistently resulted in the highest yields, while the unweeded control (T8) showed substantial yield reductions. Site emerged as the most influential factor in yield variability, highlighting the necessity of site‐specific weed management strategies. Model validation through residual diagnostics confirmed a robust model fit. These findings underscore the importance of environment‐specific and integrated weed management approaches for enhancing taro yield sustainability across diverse agro‐climatic conditions.

Weed ResearchVol. 65(3)
University of Horticultural Sciences Bagalkote (IN), Central Tuber Crops Research Institute (IN), Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (IN), Birsa Agricultural University (IN), Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agriculture University (IN), Indira Gandhi Agricultural University (IN), Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology (IN), Dr. Y.S.R Horticultural University (IN), Sri Konda Laxman Telangana State Horticultural University (IN), Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya (IN), Central Agricultural University (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.