Red Pills, Blue Books: Youth Political Consciousness and the Epistemic Struggle Between YouTube and the University

What happens when YouTube and the university offer competing visions of political reality? Drawing on 25 interviews, this article explores how young people navigate political meaning in the age of digital capitalism. While conservative influencers on YouTube offer emotionally charged, algorithmically amplified narratives of ‘common sense’, social science classrooms provide tools for critique and structural analysis. But access to the latter is increasingly constrained by tuition, austerity, and ideological attacks. Using a Gramscian lens, I argue that political consciousness is shaped through an epistemic struggle between two asymmetrical knowledge systems: the expansive, frictionless world of YouTube, and the embattled, slow-moving institution of the university. In tracing how political meaning is shaped across these spaces, the article shows how the social sciences can still cultivate ‘good sense’, but only when students are able to reach them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205251348946
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political theory and Gramsci
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Red Pills, Blue Books: Youth Political Consciousness and the Epistemic Struggle Between YouTube and the University

Emine Fidan Elcioglu
1 citations
Critical Sociology
Political theory and Gramsci
4.20
article

Red Pills, Blue Books: Youth Political Consciousness and the Epistemic Struggle Between YouTube and the University

Emine Fidan Elcioglu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

What happens when YouTube and the university offer competing visions of political reality? Drawing on 25 interviews, this article explores how young people navigate political meaning in the age of digital capitalism. While conservative influencers on YouTube offer emotionally charged, algorithmically amplified narratives of ‘common sense’, social science classrooms provide tools for critique and structural analysis. But access to the latter is increasingly constrained by tuition, austerity, and ideological attacks. Using a Gramscian lens, I argue that political consciousness is shaped through an epistemic struggle between two asymmetrical knowledge systems: the expansive, frictionless world of YouTube, and the embattled, slow-moving institution of the university. In tracing how political meaning is shaped across these spaces, the article shows how the social sciences can still cultivate ‘good sense’, but only when students are able to reach them.

Critical Sociology
University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Political theory and Gramsci
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.