Optimizing Epilepsy Management In The Elderly: A Cohort Study Comparing Brivacetam And Levetiracetam

Background: Managing epilepsy in older people is more difficult because of changes in how drugs work with age, cognitive decline, and a greater risk of side effects. Levetiracetam and Brivaracetam are newer-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that are often prescribed. However, there is still not enough real-world data comparing their safety, tolerability, and effects on quality of life in older people. Objective: To see how levetiracetam and brivaracetam monotherapy affect the quality of life, seizure control, cognition, mood, frailty, and safety of older people with epilepsy over a 24-week treatment period. Methods: This was a 24-week, open-label, observational cohort study done at a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, India. We enrolled 80 people with epilepsy who were at least 65 years old and divided them into two groups of 40 based on whether they were currently taking levetiracetam or brivaracetam. The Older People's Quality of Life Questionnaire (OPQOL-35), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and seizure diaries were all used for baseline and follow-up assessments. We checked compliance every month and kept track of any bad things that happened during the study. Results: At 24 weeks, both groups had significant improvements in their OPQOL-35 scores, but brivaracetam had a bigger mean improvement than levetiracetam (Δ = 5.4 points; p = 0.038). Both groups saw improvements in cognitive function and mood, but brivaracetam had a statistically significant edge in MMSE and GDS-15 change scores. Adverse events happened more often in the levetiracetam group (35%) than in the brivaracetam group (20%). Most of these events were mild neuropsychiatric or systemic symptoms. Conclusion: Brivaracetam was better tolerated and led to bigger improvements in quality of life and cognitive measures than levetiracetam. This supports its use in older people with epilepsy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i32s.7388
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Epilepsy Management In The Elderly: A Cohort Study Comparing Brivacetam And Levetiracetam

C. Ramya, Krishnan Karthickeyan, P. Shanmugasundaram
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

Optimizing Epilepsy Management In The Elderly: A Cohort Study Comparing Brivacetam And Levetiracetam

C. Ramya, Krishnan Karthickeyan, P. Shanmugasundaram
article en

Abstract

Background: Managing epilepsy in older people is more difficult because of changes in how drugs work with age, cognitive decline, and a greater risk of side effects. Levetiracetam and Brivaracetam are newer-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that are often prescribed. However, there is still not enough real-world data comparing their safety, tolerability, and effects on quality of life in older people. Objective: To see how levetiracetam and brivaracetam monotherapy affect the quality of life, seizure control, cognition, mood, frailty, and safety of older people with epilepsy over a 24-week treatment period. Methods: This was a 24-week, open-label, observational cohort study done at a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, India. We enrolled 80 people with epilepsy who were at least 65 years old and divided them into two groups of 40 based on whether they were currently taking levetiracetam or brivaracetam. The Older People's Quality of Life Questionnaire (OPQOL-35), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and seizure diaries were all used for baseline and follow-up assessments. We checked compliance every month and kept track of any bad things that happened during the study. Results: At 24 weeks, both groups had significant improvements in their OPQOL-35 scores, but brivaracetam had a bigger mean improvement than levetiracetam (Δ = 5.4 points; p = 0.038). Both groups saw improvements in cognitive function and mood, but brivaracetam had a statistically significant edge in MMSE and GDS-15 change scores. Adverse events happened more often in the levetiracetam group (35%) than in the brivaracetam group (20%). Most of these events were mild neuropsychiatric or systemic symptoms. Conclusion: Brivaracetam was better tolerated and led to bigger improvements in quality of life and cognitive measures than levetiracetam. This supports its use in older people with epilepsy.

Journal of Neonatal SurgeryVol. 14(32S)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimizing Epilepsy Management In The Elderly: A Cohort Study Comparing Brivacetam And Levetiracetam — C. Ramya, Krishnan Karthickeyan, et al. · Journal of Neonatal Surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS