THE HYBRID STRUCTURE OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES: AN EVALUATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRADITIONAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

This article evaluates the "hybrid" institutional structure of development agencies established in Turkey in 2006, within the framework of traditional public administration principles. While traditional public administration is based on principles such as equality, impartiality, public interest, and accountability, development agencies possess a flexible, multi-actor, and market-oriented structure aligned with neoliberal policies. The study compares the current structure and functioning of these agencies with these principles, highlighting institutional and administrative issues. Document analysis and conceptual analysis methods are employed to question whether the agencies aim for local development or marketization. The study offers a comprehensive evaluation of the compatibility of development agencies with the principles of public interest and democratic oversight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.1695908
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE HYBRID STRUCTURE OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES: AN EVALUATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRADITIONAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Emine Özlem Köroğlu
Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

THE HYBRID STRUCTURE OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES: AN EVALUATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRADITIONAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Emine Özlem Köroğlu
article en

Abstract

This article evaluates the "hybrid" institutional structure of development agencies established in Turkey in 2006, within the framework of traditional public administration principles. While traditional public administration is based on principles such as equality, impartiality, public interest, and accountability, development agencies possess a flexible, multi-actor, and market-oriented structure aligned with neoliberal policies. The study compares the current structure and functioning of these agencies with these principles, highlighting institutional and administrative issues. Document analysis and conceptual analysis methods are employed to question whether the agencies aim for local development or marketization. The study offers a comprehensive evaluation of the compatibility of development agencies with the principles of public interest and democratic oversight.

Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler DergisiVol. 11(1)
Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institute (US), Mersin Üniversitesi (TR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.