What does the equity term structure tell us about Trump 2.0′s first 100 days in office?

• Short-term assets gained value, while the overall equity market declined in Trump 2.0’s first 100 days. • Investors overestimated Trump’s policy impacts, causing market overreactions. • Pre-election, dividend prices negatively correlated with Trump’s winning probability. We analyze the equity term structure during Trump 2.0’s first 100 days to examine the narrative from the Trump administration that his policies will bring short-term pain in exchange for long-term gain. We find that the price of short-term assets (assets that entitle the owner to the dividends of the aggregate market over the near term) increased in value, whereas the aggregate market itself decreased in value. This differs from the president’s narrative. The evidence from the pre-election period suggests that investors might have initially overestimated the short- and long-term impacts of Trump’s policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Letters
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112460
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What does the equity term structure tell us about Trump 2.0′s first 100 days in office?

Benjamin Golez, Ben Matthies, Peter Kelly
1 citations
Economics Letters
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
2.21
article

What does the equity term structure tell us about Trump 2.0′s first 100 days in office?

Benjamin Golez, Ben Matthies, Peter Kelly
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Short-term assets gained value, while the overall equity market declined in Trump 2.0’s first 100 days. • Investors overestimated Trump’s policy impacts, causing market overreactions. • Pre-election, dividend prices negatively correlated with Trump’s winning probability. We analyze the equity term structure during Trump 2.0’s first 100 days to examine the narrative from the Trump administration that his policies will bring short-term pain in exchange for long-term gain. We find that the price of short-term assets (assets that entitle the owner to the dividends of the aggregate market over the near term) increased in value, whereas the aggregate market itself decreased in value. This differs from the president’s narrative. The evidence from the pre-election period suggests that investors might have initially overestimated the short- and long-term impacts of Trump’s policies.

Economics LettersVol. 254
Claremont McKenna College (US), University of Notre Dame (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.