LTL-based conformance checking of fuzzy event logs

While traditional process mining techniques assume that the event data used for analysis are faithful and complete, the field is increasingly recognizing the need of novel techniques able to accommodate uncertainty on events and the activities they refer to. The vast majority of approaches proposed so far adopts a probabilistic interpretation of uncertainty, where every event comes with a probability distribution on the possible activities. Motivated by scenarios where event data are obtained through event recognition pipelines starting from raw, unstructured data, in this work we argue for the first time for a different interpretation of uncertainty, akin to a fuzzy semantics. Under this interpretation, every event comes with an indication of the “intensity” of execution of each activity. In this novel setting, we study a form of conformance checking where fuzzy events are verified against declarative temporal rules specified using linear temporal logic over finite traces (LTLf), the logic underlying the well-known Declare declarative process specification language. Dealing with fuzzy events requires to relax the assumption that at each instant only one activity is executed, and in turn to adopt a fuzzy semantics for the state formulae of the logic. Technically, we tackle LTL-based conformance checking of fuzzy event logs with a fourfold contribution. First, we introduce a fuzzy counterpart of LTLf tailored to our purpose. Second, we define conformance checking over fuzzy event logs as a verification problem in this logic. Third, we provide an efficient implementation based on the PyTorch Python library, suited to check conformance of multiple fuzzy traces at once. Finally, we show feasibility and scalability through an extensive experimental evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Process Science
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44311-025-00020-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LTL-based conformance checking of fuzzy event logs

Craig Innes, Marco Montali, Paolo Felli, Ivan Donadello et al.
1 citations
Process Science
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
2.28
article

LTL-based conformance checking of fuzzy event logs

Craig Innes, Marco Montali, Paolo Felli, Ivan Donadello, Fabrizio Maria Maggi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While traditional process mining techniques assume that the event data used for analysis are faithful and complete, the field is increasingly recognizing the need of novel techniques able to accommodate uncertainty on events and the activities they refer to. The vast majority of approaches proposed so far adopts a probabilistic interpretation of uncertainty, where every event comes with a probability distribution on the possible activities. Motivated by scenarios where event data are obtained through event recognition pipelines starting from raw, unstructured data, in this work we argue for the first time for a different interpretation of uncertainty, akin to a fuzzy semantics. Under this interpretation, every event comes with an indication of the “intensity” of execution of each activity. In this novel setting, we study a form of conformance checking where fuzzy events are verified against declarative temporal rules specified using linear temporal logic over finite traces (LTLf), the logic underlying the well-known Declare declarative process specification language. Dealing with fuzzy events requires to relax the assumption that at each instant only one activity is executed, and in turn to adopt a fuzzy semantics for the state formulae of the logic. Technically, we tackle LTL-based conformance checking of fuzzy event logs with a fourfold contribution. First, we introduce a fuzzy counterpart of LTLf tailored to our purpose. Second, we define conformance checking over fuzzy event logs as a verification problem in this logic. Third, we provide an efficient implementation based on the PyTorch Python library, suited to check conformance of multiple fuzzy traces at once. Finally, we show feasibility and scalability through an extensive experimental evaluation.

Process ScienceVol. 2(1)
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), University of Bologna (IT), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Libera Università di Bolzano
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
2.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.