Development and validation of the Aarhus Structured Clinical Interview for Prolonged Grief Disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR (A-PGDi)
<b>Background:</b> Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) is a new disorder. A structured clinical interview for ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR PGD is a necessary tool in diagnosing PGD needed as PGD is implemented as a mental disorder in health services across the world.<b>Objective:</b> This study developed and validated The Aarhus PGD Interview (A-PGDi) to provide clinicians with free access to a valid method to diagnose PGD in alignment with recent diagnostic requirements in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR and to training materials.<b>Method:</b> The A-PGDi was developed in close collaboration between scientists, clinicians, and bereaved individuals. First, all PGD-symptoms underwent two rounds of item-formulations by clinicians and researchers. Then, a first version of the A-PGDi was tested in a group of bereaved adults with PGD symptoms, who were interviewed about the A-PGDi. The A-PGDi was refined according to their responses, piloted in 13 bereaved adults and further refined to its final version. The validity of A-PGDi was then tested with clinical interviews for PGD, PTSD, depression, and anxiety performed by carefully trained clinical interviewers in a sample of 124 bereaved adults (mean age 47 years (range 19-83 years); 85% female).<b>Results:</b> Benchmarked against a self-report measure of PGD and moderate to substantial inter-diagnostic agreement between ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR diagnoses the A-PGDi had sufficient content validity. Significant relations between PGD-diagnosis and other mental disorders estimated with clinical interviews and self-report scales and moderate to substantial inter-diagnostic and test-retest agreement indicated sufficient criterion validity and reliability.<b>Limitations:</b> small non-probability sample with PGD symptoms; self-identified for participation; mostly female.<b>Conclusions:</b> The results indicate that A-PGDi with some limitations is a valid structured clinical interview for diagnosing both ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR PGD that is relevant to administer in mental health settings to ensure correct diagnostics and the most helpful treatment plan for people with PGD.
Authors
- Nicolai Ladegaard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7404-0203)
- Richard Allan Bryant (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-819X)
- Maja O’Connor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-8633)
- Maria Louison Vang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7031-4070)
- Katrine B. Komischke-Konnerup (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4906-1843)
- Lisbeth Frostholm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9683-7416)
- Christina Buur
Institutions
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Odense University Hospital (DK)
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Danish National Centre for Social Research (DK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Journal of Psychotraumatology
- Published
- 2025-06-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2511373
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 13.84
Funders
- Velux Fonden