Development and validation of the Aarhus Structured Clinical Interview for Prolonged Grief Disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR (A-PGDi)

<b>Background:</b> Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) is a new disorder. A structured clinical interview for ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR PGD is a necessary tool in diagnosing PGD needed as PGD is implemented as a mental disorder in health services across the world.<b>Objective:</b> This study developed and validated The Aarhus PGD Interview (A-PGDi) to provide clinicians with free access to a valid method to diagnose PGD in alignment with recent diagnostic requirements in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR and to training materials.<b>Method:</b> The A-PGDi was developed in close collaboration between scientists, clinicians, and bereaved individuals. First, all PGD-symptoms underwent two rounds of item-formulations by clinicians and researchers. Then, a first version of the A-PGDi was tested in a group of bereaved adults with PGD symptoms, who were interviewed about the A-PGDi. The A-PGDi was refined according to their responses, piloted in 13 bereaved adults and further refined to its final version. The validity of A-PGDi was then tested with clinical interviews for PGD, PTSD, depression, and anxiety performed by carefully trained clinical interviewers in a sample of 124 bereaved adults (mean age 47 years (range 19-83 years); 85% female).<b>Results:</b> Benchmarked against a self-report measure of PGD and moderate to substantial inter-diagnostic agreement between ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR diagnoses the A-PGDi had sufficient content validity. Significant relations between PGD-diagnosis and other mental disorders estimated with clinical interviews and self-report scales and moderate to substantial inter-diagnostic and test-retest agreement indicated sufficient criterion validity and reliability.<b>Limitations:</b> small non-probability sample with PGD symptoms; self-identified for participation; mostly female.<b>Conclusions:</b> The results indicate that A-PGDi with some limitations is a valid structured clinical interview for diagnosing both ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR PGD that is relevant to administer in mental health settings to ensure correct diagnostics and the most helpful treatment plan for people with PGD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2511373
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of the Aarhus Structured Clinical Interview for Prolonged Grief Disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR (A-PGDi)

Nicolai Ladegaard, Richard Allan Bryant, Maja O’Connor, Maria Louison Vang et al.
6 citations
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
13.84
article

Development and validation of the Aarhus Structured Clinical Interview for Prolonged Grief Disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR (A-PGDi)

Nicolai Ladegaard, Richard Allan Bryant, Maja O’Connor, Maria Louison Vang, Katrine B. Komischke-Konnerup, Lisbeth Frostholm, Christina Buur
article en
6 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) is a new disorder. A structured clinical interview for ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR PGD is a necessary tool in diagnosing PGD needed as PGD is implemented as a mental disorder in health services across the world.<b>Objective:</b> This study developed and validated The Aarhus PGD Interview (A-PGDi) to provide clinicians with free access to a valid method to diagnose PGD in alignment with recent diagnostic requirements in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR and to training materials.<b>Method:</b> The A-PGDi was developed in close collaboration between scientists, clinicians, and bereaved individuals. First, all PGD-symptoms underwent two rounds of item-formulations by clinicians and researchers. Then, a first version of the A-PGDi was tested in a group of bereaved adults with PGD symptoms, who were interviewed about the A-PGDi. The A-PGDi was refined according to their responses, piloted in 13 bereaved adults and further refined to its final version. The validity of A-PGDi was then tested with clinical interviews for PGD, PTSD, depression, and anxiety performed by carefully trained clinical interviewers in a sample of 124 bereaved adults (mean age 47 years (range 19-83 years); 85% female).<b>Results:</b> Benchmarked against a self-report measure of PGD and moderate to substantial inter-diagnostic agreement between ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR diagnoses the A-PGDi had sufficient content validity. Significant relations between PGD-diagnosis and other mental disorders estimated with clinical interviews and self-report scales and moderate to substantial inter-diagnostic and test-retest agreement indicated sufficient criterion validity and reliability.<b>Limitations:</b> small non-probability sample with PGD symptoms; self-identified for participation; mostly female.<b>Conclusions:</b> The results indicate that A-PGDi with some limitations is a valid structured clinical interview for diagnosing both ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR PGD that is relevant to administer in mental health settings to ensure correct diagnostics and the most helpful treatment plan for people with PGD.

European Journal of PsychotraumatologyVol. 16(1)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), UNSW Sydney (AU), Danish National Centre for Social Research (DK)
Velux Fonden
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
13.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.