Orbital relativistic correction resulting from the Earth’s oblateness term

Abstract In the IERS Conventions, the general relativistic (GR) corrections to the motion of artificial satellites assume that the Earth is a regular sphere. We found, however, that the missing orbital GR correction resulting from the Earth’s oblateness for low earth orbiters (LEO) is greater by a factor of three than the geodetic precession, i.e., the relativistic effect included in the IERS Conventions. We test the impact of the relativistic oblateness correction on the orbits of geodetic satellites, such as Starlette and LARES, as well as on GRACE-FO and the future MAGIC mission dedicated to the gravity field recovery. Moreover, we derive the gravity field based on GRACE-FO data to check the impact of the missing GR correction on GRACE products. We found that the GR oblateness correction induces accelerations of the order of 10 –10 m/s 2 , which is above the sensitivity of current LEO orbit determination procedures. This effect causes a secular rate of the ascending node up to 2 mm/day and introduces a systematic bias to the GRACE-derived C 20 values of 3.0·10 –12 . Neglecting GR oblateness correction results in biased estimates of the GRACE-based equivalent water heights at the millimeter level. Therefore, this correction should be considered in geodetic products based on LEO satellite observations that require accuracy at the level of millimeters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geodesy
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01973-3
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orbital relativistic correction resulting from the Earth’s oblateness term

Filip Gałdyn, Krzysztof Sośnica
Journal of Geodesy
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
article

Orbital relativistic correction resulting from the Earth’s oblateness term

Filip Gałdyn, Krzysztof Sośnica
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the IERS Conventions, the general relativistic (GR) corrections to the motion of artificial satellites assume that the Earth is a regular sphere. We found, however, that the missing orbital GR correction resulting from the Earth’s oblateness for low earth orbiters (LEO) is greater by a factor of three than the geodetic precession, i.e., the relativistic effect included in the IERS Conventions. We test the impact of the relativistic oblateness correction on the orbits of geodetic satellites, such as Starlette and LARES, as well as on GRACE-FO and the future MAGIC mission dedicated to the gravity field recovery. Moreover, we derive the gravity field based on GRACE-FO data to check the impact of the missing GR correction on GRACE products. We found that the GR oblateness correction induces accelerations of the order of 10 –10 m/s 2 , which is above the sensitivity of current LEO orbit determination procedures. This effect causes a secular rate of the ascending node up to 2 mm/day and introduces a systematic bias to the GRACE-derived C 20 values of 3.0·10 –12 . Neglecting GR oblateness correction results in biased estimates of the GRACE-based equivalent water heights at the millimeter level. Therefore, this correction should be considered in geodetic products based on LEO satellite observations that require accuracy at the level of millimeters.

Journal of GeodesyVol. 99(7)
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences (PL)
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.