Brewing crises: Bud Light's stakeholders’ loyalty and crisis communication fizzle

Organisations must clearly understand their stakeholders’ social identities and expectations when making operational and marketing decisions. Failure to do so can lead to a significant backlash that needs to be addressed with textbook crisis communication. This study examines Anheuser-Busch's response to the 2023 Bud Light crisis using the Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) and analyses stakeholder outrage factors through Instagram posts. This research identifies key outrage factors – primarily trust (52.63%) and control (44.74%) – and the prevalence of humour, particularly sarcasm, in 70% of reactions. Findings indicate that Anheuser-Busch's response lacked core crisis communication principles, focusing on patriotism and product quality (Bolstering) rather than direct crisis acknowledgment or apology (Rebuild). This study highlights the necessity for corporations to align crisis communication with stakeholder expectations and social identities to mitigate reputational damage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media International Australia
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x251337819
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brewing crises: Bud Light's stakeholders’ loyalty and crisis communication fizzle

Manolo Iachizzi
Media International Australia
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Brewing crises: Bud Light's stakeholders’ loyalty and crisis communication fizzle

Manolo Iachizzi
article en

Abstract

Organisations must clearly understand their stakeholders’ social identities and expectations when making operational and marketing decisions. Failure to do so can lead to a significant backlash that needs to be addressed with textbook crisis communication. This study examines Anheuser-Busch's response to the 2023 Bud Light crisis using the Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) and analyses stakeholder outrage factors through Instagram posts. This research identifies key outrage factors – primarily trust (52.63%) and control (44.74%) – and the prevalence of humour, particularly sarcasm, in 70% of reactions. Findings indicate that Anheuser-Busch's response lacked core crisis communication principles, focusing on patriotism and product quality (Bolstering) rather than direct crisis acknowledgment or apology (Rebuild). This study highlights the necessity for corporations to align crisis communication with stakeholder expectations and social identities to mitigate reputational damage.

Media International Australia
Griffith University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Brewing crises: Bud Light's stakeholders’ loyalty and crisis communication fizzle — Manolo Iachizzi · Media International Australia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS