Foreign Aid Composition and Sustaining Peace After War

This article examines the relationship between aggregate foreign aid and conflict relapse or sustained peace in postconflict settings. We use Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) data for all country allocable aid to postconflict contexts in the 1990–2022 period, and break down aid into humanitarian, development and peacebuilding types. The findings confirm a statistical relationship between total aid levels and sustained peace. Results also highlight the composition of the aid portfolio as important for avoiding conflict relapse—the peacebuilding support share in particular. Our contribution is to take a necessary first step to analyse the collective behavior of donors in postconflict environments across different aid types. The findings lay the necessary groundwork for future research on the causal relationship between peacebuilding assistance and conflict. At a time where aid budgets are shrinking and the number of armed conflicts is high, traditional and new donors alike are forced to consider aid effectiveness and how to prioritise between different forms of support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Peacebuilding & Development
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15423166251348785
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foreign Aid Composition and Sustaining Peace After War

Asmita Ahmad, Jannie Lilja, Gary Milante, Tobias Lindé
Journal of Peacebuilding & Development
International Development and Aid
article

Foreign Aid Composition and Sustaining Peace After War

Asmita Ahmad, Jannie Lilja, Gary Milante, Tobias Lindé
article en

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between aggregate foreign aid and conflict relapse or sustained peace in postconflict settings. We use Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) data for all country allocable aid to postconflict contexts in the 1990–2022 period, and break down aid into humanitarian, development and peacebuilding types. The findings confirm a statistical relationship between total aid levels and sustained peace. Results also highlight the composition of the aid portfolio as important for avoiding conflict relapse—the peacebuilding support share in particular. Our contribution is to take a necessary first step to analyse the collective behavior of donors in postconflict environments across different aid types. The findings lay the necessary groundwork for future research on the causal relationship between peacebuilding assistance and conflict. At a time where aid budgets are shrinking and the number of armed conflicts is high, traditional and new donors alike are forced to consider aid effectiveness and how to prioritise between different forms of support.

Journal of Peacebuilding & DevelopmentVol. 20(3)
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.