Swimming speed comparison between two distinct arm pulls during the butterfly swim stroke

The aim of this study was to compare the butterfly swimming speed during the insweep phase of two distinct arm pull patterns. Ten national-level swimmers (5 males with 17.5 ± 0.8-years and 5 females with 16.8 ± 0.9-years) were analyzed while performing butterfly all-out trials based on two distinct arm-pull patterns (“bent” and “straight”). The “bent” arm-pull refers to the stroke kinematics they use to swim. The “straight” arm-pull refers to a more extended elbow than they used to swim. Based on discrete variables, swimming speed was faster in the “straight” than the “bent” arm-pull, but not significantly ( p = 0.546). Non-significant differences were also noted for the remaining discrete variables. Conversely, Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM, continuous analysis) identified significant differences in swimming speed between ∼42% and ∼60% (insweep phase and the beginning of the upsweep phase; p = 0.001), and ∼83% and ∼87% (halfway through the release and recovery, respectively; p = 0.043) of the stroke cycle. SPM was more sensitive in identifying differences in swimming speed between arm pulls. Swimmers were faster while performing the “straight” arm pull than with the “bent” arm pull, predominately based on a faster swimming speed during the insweep phase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251350363
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Swimming speed comparison between two distinct arm pulls during the butterfly swim stroke

Tiago M. Barbosa, Daniel A. Marinho, Henrique P. Neiva, Shin-Ichiro Moriyama et al.
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sports Performance and Training
article

Swimming speed comparison between two distinct arm pulls during the butterfly swim stroke

Tiago M. Barbosa, Daniel A. Marinho, Henrique P. Neiva, Shin-Ichiro Moriyama, Jorge E. Morais
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the butterfly swimming speed during the insweep phase of two distinct arm pull patterns. Ten national-level swimmers (5 males with 17.5 ± 0.8-years and 5 females with 16.8 ± 0.9-years) were analyzed while performing butterfly all-out trials based on two distinct arm-pull patterns (“bent” and “straight”). The “bent” arm-pull refers to the stroke kinematics they use to swim. The “straight” arm-pull refers to a more extended elbow than they used to swim. Based on discrete variables, swimming speed was faster in the “straight” than the “bent” arm-pull, but not significantly ( p = 0.546). Non-significant differences were also noted for the remaining discrete variables. Conversely, Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM, continuous analysis) identified significant differences in swimming speed between ∼42% and ∼60% (insweep phase and the beginning of the upsweep phase; p = 0.001), and ∼83% and ∼87% (halfway through the release and recovery, respectively; p = 0.043) of the stroke cycle. SPM was more sensitive in identifying differences in swimming speed between arm pulls. Swimmers were faster while performing the “straight” arm pull than with the “bent” arm pull, predominately based on a faster swimming speed during the insweep phase.

International Journal of Sports Science & CoachingVol. 20(5)
Tokyo Gakugei University (JP), University of Beira Interior (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.