How Participation in Payment for Ecosystem Services Shapes Perception of Ecosystem Services and Conservation Willingness

It is imperative to comprehend the impact of payment for ecosystem services (PES) policies on local communities’ perceptions for effective environmental management. However, recent studies on how PES programs impact local communities’ environmental perceptions and conservation willingness remain limited. To better understand local communities’ perceptions of ecosystem services (ES) under various PES programs, we conducted 381 face-to-face household surveys in the Dashanbao Protected Area (DPA), China. Using path analysis and multiple correspondence analysis, we examined how participation experiences in PES program influence communities’ perceptions of ES and shape their conservation willingness and environmental decision-making intentions. The results indicated a significant difference in the perception of ES between PES program participants and nonparticipants. Respondents’ participation in payment for wetland ecosystem services (PWES) significantly and positively influenced their perception of ES, whereas involvement in unsustainable PES programs had a significant negative effect. Additionally, respondents’ perception of ES significantly and positively influenced subsequent conservation willingness and land-use-related environmental decision-making. However, livelihood income was not the primary driving factor. Instead, factors associated with ES perception and social background shaped local communities’ willingness to participate in conservation. These findings underscore the importance of well-designed and sustainable PES schemes. The results highlight the need to enhance our understanding of how PES initiatives influence human perception, conservation willingness, and environmental decision-making within the coupled human and natural systems of protected areas. It can also potentially shed light on related environmental management schemes aimed at achieving ecosystem health goals and sustainable community development worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34133/ehs.0381
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Participation in Payment for Ecosystem Services Shapes Perception of Ecosystem Services and Conservation Willingness

Zhenglin Qiao, Chengzhao Wu, David López‐Carr, Wanting Peng et al.
4 citations
Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
4.42
article

How Participation in Payment for Ecosystem Services Shapes Perception of Ecosystem Services and Conservation Willingness

Zhenglin Qiao, Chengzhao Wu, David López‐Carr, Wanting Peng, Yufei Chen, Yu Guan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

It is imperative to comprehend the impact of payment for ecosystem services (PES) policies on local communities’ perceptions for effective environmental management. However, recent studies on how PES programs impact local communities’ environmental perceptions and conservation willingness remain limited. To better understand local communities’ perceptions of ecosystem services (ES) under various PES programs, we conducted 381 face-to-face household surveys in the Dashanbao Protected Area (DPA), China. Using path analysis and multiple correspondence analysis, we examined how participation experiences in PES program influence communities’ perceptions of ES and shape their conservation willingness and environmental decision-making intentions. The results indicated a significant difference in the perception of ES between PES program participants and nonparticipants. Respondents’ participation in payment for wetland ecosystem services (PWES) significantly and positively influenced their perception of ES, whereas involvement in unsustainable PES programs had a significant negative effect. Additionally, respondents’ perception of ES significantly and positively influenced subsequent conservation willingness and land-use-related environmental decision-making. However, livelihood income was not the primary driving factor. Instead, factors associated with ES perception and social background shaped local communities’ willingness to participate in conservation. These findings underscore the importance of well-designed and sustainable PES schemes. The results highlight the need to enhance our understanding of how PES initiatives influence human perception, conservation willingness, and environmental decision-making within the coupled human and natural systems of protected areas. It can also potentially shed light on related environmental management schemes aimed at achieving ecosystem health goals and sustainable community development worldwide.

Ecosystem Health and SustainabilityVol. 11
Tongji University (CN), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Southwest Forestry University (CN), Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning and Design Institute (CN), Ministry of Education (TW)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.