Spatial distribution patterns and driving factors of ecosystem services and ecological vulnerability in ecologically fragile areas: a case study of the Zhang-Cheng area

Integrating ecosystem services (ES) and the ecological vulnerability index (EVI) to analyze the spatial distribution of ecological spaces provides valuable insights into promoting the sustainable development of ecologically fragile regions. To explore the spatial distribution patterns of ES and EVI in such areas, the Zhangjiakou-Chengde (ZC) area was selected as the study region. Four key ES—water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), carbon sequestration (CS), and food supply (FS)—were assessed, and EVI was evaluated using the Sensitivity-Resilience-Pressure (SRP) model, with Z-score normalization revealing their spatial distribution patterns. The results showed that: (1) ES exhibited an increasing trend, while EVI decreased, with the most significant changes occurring between 2000 and 2010. Spatial patterns revealed that WY, SC, and CS increased from west to east, while FS and EVI decreased, with higher ecological vulnerability in the west; (2) Following Z-score normalization, ES and EVI were categorized into four quadrants: Quadrant I (High ES, High EVI) indicates areas with strong functions but high vulnerability due to human activities and climate change; Quadrant II (Low ES, High EVI) includes arid/semi-arid areas with high restoration potential; Quadrant III (Low ES, Low EVI) covers regions in need of ecological restoration; Quadrant IV (High ES, Low EVI) comprises areas with effective protection and low vulnerability; (3) Climate factors and land use changes significantly impacted the spatial distribution of ES and EVI. Interactions among multiple drivers, particularly in areas with intense human activities, amplified their effects. The findings offer important theoretical support for developing more precise ecological restoration and protection strategies and promoting sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2025.1570779
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial distribution patterns and driving factors of ecosystem services and ecological vulnerability in ecologically fragile areas: a case study of the Zhang-Cheng area

Yue Yang, Wei Ren, Ye Wang, Zhongcai Xue et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

Spatial distribution patterns and driving factors of ecosystem services and ecological vulnerability in ecologically fragile areas: a case study of the Zhang-Cheng area

Yue Yang, Wei Ren, Ye Wang, Zhongcai Xue, C. Wu, An-qi Ju
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Integrating ecosystem services (ES) and the ecological vulnerability index (EVI) to analyze the spatial distribution of ecological spaces provides valuable insights into promoting the sustainable development of ecologically fragile regions. To explore the spatial distribution patterns of ES and EVI in such areas, the Zhangjiakou-Chengde (ZC) area was selected as the study region. Four key ES—water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), carbon sequestration (CS), and food supply (FS)—were assessed, and EVI was evaluated using the Sensitivity-Resilience-Pressure (SRP) model, with Z-score normalization revealing their spatial distribution patterns. The results showed that: (1) ES exhibited an increasing trend, while EVI decreased, with the most significant changes occurring between 2000 and 2010. Spatial patterns revealed that WY, SC, and CS increased from west to east, while FS and EVI decreased, with higher ecological vulnerability in the west; (2) Following Z-score normalization, ES and EVI were categorized into four quadrants: Quadrant I (High ES, High EVI) indicates areas with strong functions but high vulnerability due to human activities and climate change; Quadrant II (Low ES, High EVI) includes arid/semi-arid areas with high restoration potential; Quadrant III (Low ES, Low EVI) covers regions in need of ecological restoration; Quadrant IV (High ES, Low EVI) comprises areas with effective protection and low vulnerability; (3) Climate factors and land use changes significantly impacted the spatial distribution of ES and EVI. Interactions among multiple drivers, particularly in areas with intense human activities, amplified their effects. The findings offer important theoretical support for developing more precise ecological restoration and protection strategies and promoting sustainable development.

Frontiers in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 13
Chengde Medical University (CN), Hebei Normal University (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.