The Role of Genetic Variation in Modulating the Effects of Blended Fruits and Vegetables Versus Fruit- and Vegetable-Coated Food Products on Antioxidant Capacity, DNA Protection, and Vascular Health: A Randomized Controlled Trial

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Fruits and vegetables (F&Vs) are major dietary sources of phytochemicals, crucial for preventing non-communicable diseases. However, barriers such as preparation inconvenience and a short shelf life hinder their consumption. F&V-coated foods have emerged as an alternative. This human nutrition intervention study assessed the effects of a blended F&Vs mixture versus an F&V-coated food on phytochemical absorption and chronic disease risk markers. It also explored how genetic variation influences physiological responses to these F&V products. <b>Methods</b>: In this randomized-controlled trial, participants were assigned to one of three dietary interventions: a blended F&V mixture ("F&V Blend"), a rice-based cereal product coated with this blend ("Coated Pearl"), or the same product without the F&V mixture ("Uncoated Pearl"). The four-week study included a two-week run-in and a two-week intervention phase, each followed by a test day. Measurements included DNA damage resistance (comet assay), plasma antioxidant status (Trolox capacity and superoxide levels), microvasculature health (retinal analysis), and plasma phytochemical concentrations (colorimetric analyses or HPLC). To assess group differences, a linear mixed model was used. Fifteen polymorphic genes related to phytochemical metabolism and oxidative stress were tested using TaqMan and PCR, with outcomes analyzed via ANOVA. <b>Results</b>: The F&V Blend and Coated Pearl products increased plasma carotenoid levels versus the Uncoated Pearl product. Only the F&V Blend improved retinal dilation and DNA resistance. Surprisingly, the Uncoated Pearl product enhanced antioxidant capacity, lowered superoxide levels, and improved retinal microvasculature. Genotype effects were minimal, except for HNF1A, where wildtypes in the Uncoated Pearl group showed a higher antioxidant capacity. <b>Conclusions</b>: Fresh F&Vs were more effective than coated alternatives in improving vascular health and DNA protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17122036
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Genetic Variation in Modulating the Effects of Blended Fruits and Vegetables Versus Fruit- and Vegetable-Coated Food Products on Antioxidant Capacity, DNA Protection, and Vascular Health: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Simone G. van Breda, Theo M. de Kok, Julia N. DeBenedictis, Na Xu
Nutrients
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

The Role of Genetic Variation in Modulating the Effects of Blended Fruits and Vegetables Versus Fruit- and Vegetable-Coated Food Products on Antioxidant Capacity, DNA Protection, and Vascular Health: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Simone G. van Breda, Theo M. de Kok, Julia N. DeBenedictis, Na Xu
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Fruits and vegetables (F&Vs) are major dietary sources of phytochemicals, crucial for preventing non-communicable diseases. However, barriers such as preparation inconvenience and a short shelf life hinder their consumption. F&V-coated foods have emerged as an alternative. This human nutrition intervention study assessed the effects of a blended F&Vs mixture versus an F&V-coated food on phytochemical absorption and chronic disease risk markers. It also explored how genetic variation influences physiological responses to these F&V products. <b>Methods</b>: In this randomized-controlled trial, participants were assigned to one of three dietary interventions: a blended F&V mixture ("F&V Blend"), a rice-based cereal product coated with this blend ("Coated Pearl"), or the same product without the F&V mixture ("Uncoated Pearl"). The four-week study included a two-week run-in and a two-week intervention phase, each followed by a test day. Measurements included DNA damage resistance (comet assay), plasma antioxidant status (Trolox capacity and superoxide levels), microvasculature health (retinal analysis), and plasma phytochemical concentrations (colorimetric analyses or HPLC). To assess group differences, a linear mixed model was used. Fifteen polymorphic genes related to phytochemical metabolism and oxidative stress were tested using TaqMan and PCR, with outcomes analyzed via ANOVA. <b>Results</b>: The F&V Blend and Coated Pearl products increased plasma carotenoid levels versus the Uncoated Pearl product. Only the F&V Blend improved retinal dilation and DNA resistance. Surprisingly, the Uncoated Pearl product enhanced antioxidant capacity, lowered superoxide levels, and improved retinal microvasculature. Genotype effects were minimal, except for HNF1A, where wildtypes in the Uncoated Pearl group showed a higher antioxidant capacity. <b>Conclusions</b>: Fresh F&Vs were more effective than coated alternatives in improving vascular health and DNA protection.

NutrientsVol. 17(12)
Maastricht University (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.