Relationships Between Muscle Activation and Thoraco-Lumbar Kinematics in Direction-Specific Low Back Pain Subgroups During Everyday Tasks

Background/Objectives: The assessment of relationships between trunk muscle activity and thoraco-lumbar movements during sagittal bending has demonstrated that low back pain (LBP) subgroups (flexion pattern and active extension pattern motor control impairment) reveal distinct relationships that differentiate these subgroups from control groups. The study objective was to establish whether such relationships exist during various daily activities. Methods: Fifty participants with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) (27 flexion pattern (FP), 23 active extension pattern (AEP)) and 28 healthy controls were recruited. Spinal kinematics were analysed using 3D motion analysis (Vicon™, Oxford, UK) and the muscle activity recorded via surface electromyography during a range of activities (box lift, box replace, reach up, step up, step down, stand-to-sit, and sit-to-stand). The mean sagittal angles for upper and lower thoracic and lumbar regions were correlated with normalised mean amplitude electromyography of bilateral transversus abdominis/internal oblique (IO), external oblique (EO), superficial lumbar multifidus (LM), and erector spinae (ES). Relationships were assessed via Pearson correlations (significance p < 0.01). Results: In the AEP group, increased spinal extension was associated with altered LM activity during box-replace, reach-up, step-up, and step-down tasks. In the FP group, increased lower lumbar spinal flexion was associated with reduced muscle activation, while increased lower thoracic flexion was associated with increased muscle activation. The control group elicited no significant associations. Correlations ranged between −0.812 and 0.754. Conclusions: Differential relationships between muscle activity and spinal kinematics exist in AEP, FP, and pain-free control groups, reinforcing previous observations that flexion or extension-related LBP involves distinct motor control strategies during different activities. These insights could inform targeted intervention approaches, such as movement-based interventions and wearable technologies, for these groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomechanics
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics5020042
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships Between Muscle Activation and Thoraco-Lumbar Kinematics in Direction-Specific Low Back Pain Subgroups During Everyday Tasks

Liba Sheeran, Valerie Sparkes, Rebecca Hemming, Alister du Rose
Biomechanics
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Relationships Between Muscle Activation and Thoraco-Lumbar Kinematics in Direction-Specific Low Back Pain Subgroups During Everyday Tasks

Liba Sheeran, Valerie Sparkes, Rebecca Hemming, Alister du Rose
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The assessment of relationships between trunk muscle activity and thoraco-lumbar movements during sagittal bending has demonstrated that low back pain (LBP) subgroups (flexion pattern and active extension pattern motor control impairment) reveal distinct relationships that differentiate these subgroups from control groups. The study objective was to establish whether such relationships exist during various daily activities. Methods: Fifty participants with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) (27 flexion pattern (FP), 23 active extension pattern (AEP)) and 28 healthy controls were recruited. Spinal kinematics were analysed using 3D motion analysis (Vicon™, Oxford, UK) and the muscle activity recorded via surface electromyography during a range of activities (box lift, box replace, reach up, step up, step down, stand-to-sit, and sit-to-stand). The mean sagittal angles for upper and lower thoracic and lumbar regions were correlated with normalised mean amplitude electromyography of bilateral transversus abdominis/internal oblique (IO), external oblique (EO), superficial lumbar multifidus (LM), and erector spinae (ES). Relationships were assessed via Pearson correlations (significance p < 0.01). Results: In the AEP group, increased spinal extension was associated with altered LM activity during box-replace, reach-up, step-up, and step-down tasks. In the FP group, increased lower lumbar spinal flexion was associated with reduced muscle activation, while increased lower thoracic flexion was associated with increased muscle activation. The control group elicited no significant associations. Correlations ranged between −0.812 and 0.754. Conclusions: Differential relationships between muscle activity and spinal kinematics exist in AEP, FP, and pain-free control groups, reinforcing previous observations that flexion or extension-related LBP involves distinct motor control strategies during different activities. These insights could inform targeted intervention approaches, such as movement-based interventions and wearable technologies, for these groups.

BiomechanicsVol. 5(2)
Health Sciences University (GB), University of Southampton (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
National Institute for Social Care and Health Research, Health and Care Research Wales, Arthritis Research UK, Cardiff University, Versus Arthritis
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.