Model predictive control for tracking with implicit invariant sets

This paper presents a model predictive control (MPC) technique for tracking with implicit terminal components. The controller formulation includes an artificial setpoint as decision variable, and the terminal constraint is defined implicitly for an augmented system that depends on the latter. In this respect, instead of computing an invariant terminal set, we consider an extended prediction horizon whose length can be bounded simply by solving LPs. This approach overcomes size-related limitations associated with the operations needed for computing invariant sets, also simplifying the offline MPC design. The proposed controller is able to drive large systems to admissible setpoints while guaranteeing recursive feasibility and convergence. Finally, the method is illustrated by an academic example, a mass–spring–damper system of variable-size and a more realistic case study of a drone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Automatica
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2025.112436
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model predictive control for tracking with implicit invariant sets

Paula Chanfreut, J. M. Maestre, Ignacio Luque, Daniel Limón
3 citations
Automatica
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
3.64
article

Model predictive control for tracking with implicit invariant sets

Paula Chanfreut, J. M. Maestre, Ignacio Luque, Daniel Limón
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a model predictive control (MPC) technique for tracking with implicit terminal components. The controller formulation includes an artificial setpoint as decision variable, and the terminal constraint is defined implicitly for an augmented system that depends on the latter. In this respect, instead of computing an invariant terminal set, we consider an extended prediction horizon whose length can be bounded simply by solving LPs. This approach overcomes size-related limitations associated with the operations needed for computing invariant sets, also simplifying the offline MPC design. The proposed controller is able to drive large systems to admissible setpoints while guaranteeing recursive feasibility and convergence. Finally, the method is illustrated by an academic example, a mass–spring–damper system of variable-size and a more realistic case study of a drone.

AutomaticaVol. 179
Universidad de Sevilla (ES), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
3.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.