Uniportal Endoscopic Microdiscectomy Is an Effective Treatment Option for Far-Lateral Lumbar Disk Herniations

<i>Background:</i> Far-lateral lumbar disk herniation (FLLDH) poses a surgical challenge given the difficulty in visualizing the pathology with traditional techniques. Endoscopic microdiscectomy is a novel technique for the treatment of FLLDH with decreased soft tissue disruption. <i>Purposes</i>: We sought to compare the efficacy of tubular versus endoscopic microdiscectomy for FLLDH. <i>Methods</i>: A retrospective cohort study was performed that included patients undergoing uniportal endoscopic or tubular decompression for FLLDH over a 5-year period. The primary outcome was patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Secondary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative radiation, length of stay (LOS), and reoperation/complication rates. Comparisons between non-paired continuous variables were done with a 2-tailed independent sample <i>t-</i>test. Categorical variables were compared with a χ<sup>2</sup> or a Fisher exact test. Significance was assumed at <i>P</i> < .05. <i>Results</i>: We identified 135 patients, 64 having undergone endoscopic and 71 tubular microdiscectomy. There were no differences in operative times (67.7 vs 68.2 minutes) or LOS (945.5 vs 911.1 minutes). Endoscopic microdiscectomy was associated with increased total fluoroscopy time (105.92 vs 34.66 seconds) and intraoperative radiation dose (33.68 vs 19.12 mGy). Postoperatively, both groups had statistically significant improvements in all PROMs at early and late follow-up. There was no difference in the magnitude of improvement or the rate of postoperative complications/reoperations between the groups. <i>Conclusion</i>: This retrospective review found that endoscopic microdiscectomy and tubular decompression were effective techniques for the treatment of FLLDH, showing significant improvement in postoperative PROMs and no differences in postoperative complications. However, endoscopic microdiscectomy is associated with increased intraoperative radiation exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316251346443
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uniportal Endoscopic Microdiscectomy Is an Effective Treatment Option for Far-Lateral Lumbar Disk Herniations

Tejas Subramanian, Prerana Katiyar, Austin C. Kaidi, Patawut Bovonratwet et al.
1 citations
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.47
article

Uniportal Endoscopic Microdiscectomy Is an Effective Treatment Option for Far-Lateral Lumbar Disk Herniations

Tejas Subramanian, Prerana Katiyar, Austin C. Kaidi, Patawut Bovonratwet, Evan Sheha, Sravisht Iyer, Annette Ehrlich, Sheeraz A Qureshi, James Dowdell, Eric Mai, Gregory S. Kazarian, Chad Simon, Joshua Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background:</i> Far-lateral lumbar disk herniation (FLLDH) poses a surgical challenge given the difficulty in visualizing the pathology with traditional techniques. Endoscopic microdiscectomy is a novel technique for the treatment of FLLDH with decreased soft tissue disruption. <i>Purposes</i>: We sought to compare the efficacy of tubular versus endoscopic microdiscectomy for FLLDH. <i>Methods</i>: A retrospective cohort study was performed that included patients undergoing uniportal endoscopic or tubular decompression for FLLDH over a 5-year period. The primary outcome was patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Secondary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative radiation, length of stay (LOS), and reoperation/complication rates. Comparisons between non-paired continuous variables were done with a 2-tailed independent sample <i>t-</i>test. Categorical variables were compared with a χ<sup>2</sup> or a Fisher exact test. Significance was assumed at <i>P</i> < .05. <i>Results</i>: We identified 135 patients, 64 having undergone endoscopic and 71 tubular microdiscectomy. There were no differences in operative times (67.7 vs 68.2 minutes) or LOS (945.5 vs 911.1 minutes). Endoscopic microdiscectomy was associated with increased total fluoroscopy time (105.92 vs 34.66 seconds) and intraoperative radiation dose (33.68 vs 19.12 mGy). Postoperatively, both groups had statistically significant improvements in all PROMs at early and late follow-up. There was no difference in the magnitude of improvement or the rate of postoperative complications/reoperations between the groups. <i>Conclusion</i>: This retrospective review found that endoscopic microdiscectomy and tubular decompression were effective techniques for the treatment of FLLDH, showing significant improvement in postoperative PROMs and no differences in postoperative complications. However, endoscopic microdiscectomy is associated with increased intraoperative radiation exposure.

HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special SurgeryVol. 22(2)
Hospital for Special Surgery (US), Cornell University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.