An Assessment of Replacing Aluminum Tubes Hosting Nuclear Fuels with Stainless Steel in a Subcritical Nuclear Reactor
This computational study using MCNP5 evaluated the feasibility of replacing 6061-T6 aluminum with 316L stainless steel (SS-316L) for the tubes hosting the uranium slugs in the subcritical nuclear reactor Nuclear Chicago model 9000, thereby contributing to its preservation as a key resource for nuclear research and education in Mexico. Simulations and dosimetric analyses (ICRP/ICRU) confirmed subcriticality in both configurations. Notably, SS-316L demonstrated an effective attenuation of peripheral gamma radiation and a reduction in the ambient neutron dose, indicating a considerable improvement in radiological safety. Although a reduction in thermal and epithermal neutron fluence was observed, the similarity in the gamma spectrum suggests no significant alteration for gamma spectroscopic experiments. In conclusion, SS-316L presents a promising alternative that enhances radiological safety and reactor longevity, making it a worthy consideration as a replacement material. Further experimental investigation is recommended to assess material activation and the gamma dose in the vicinity of the fuel.
Authors
- Antonio Baltazar-Raigosa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4245-2200)
- Tzinnia Gabriela Soto-Bernal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7563-353X)
- Héctor René Vega-Carrillo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7081-9084)
- Diego Medina-Castro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9188-5454)
- Benjamin Gonzalo Rodriguez-Mendez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0495-9118)
- Régulo López-Callejas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-4373)
Institutions
- Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares (MX)
- Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas "Francisco García Salinas" (MX)
- Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Energies
- Published
- 2025-06-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123213
- Primary Topic
- Nuclear Materials and Properties
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00