From creation to growth: examining agile and business planning for sustained ventures

Purpose Agile start-up and business planning methodologies are often considered mutually exclusive, with the former traditionally applied during venture creation and the latter encouraged to raise venture capital. However, the methodologies employed by entrepreneurs beyond the venture creation stage remain unclear. This study aims to explore the methodologies used by entrepreneurs who have sustained their ventures for at least five years, identifying their implications for venture performance and sustainability. Design/methodology/approach This research employed a survey methodology, collecting data from entrepreneurs in Australia with at least five years of venture experience. The analysis identified three distinct groups: (1) “super agile,” relying exclusively on agile start-up methodology; (2) “hybridised,” combining agile start-up and business planning, and (3) “average” entrepreneurs aspiring to use both methodologies but failing to implement them effectively. Findings “Super agile” entrepreneurs reported the highest adaptability and innovation but faced challenges in scalability and investor relations. “Hybridised” entrepreneurs reported achieving the most balanced venture performance, leveraging the adaptability of agile start-ups with the structure of business planning. In contrast, “average” entrepreneurs reported lower venture performance outcomes due to inconsistent implementation of both methodologies. Practical implications The findings offer insights into the advantages and disadvantages of these methodologies in sustaining ventures and improving performance. The study provides actionable recommendations for entrepreneurs, tertiary education providers and policymakers to support the development of entrepreneurial ecosystems that enhance post-creation venture success (e.g. educating current and aspiring entrepreneurs about agile start-up and business planning to assist in post-venture creation management, finding a balance between the two methodologies if ventures have been already operational; developing tertiary or government training programs to assist entrepreneurs and provide ongoing training). Originality/value This study uniquely examines the application of agile start-up and business planning methodologies beyond the venture creation stage, contributing to the limited research on sustaining ventures over time. It highlights practical approaches that entrepreneurs can adopt to optimise venture outcomes in dynamic business environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-12-2024-1468
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From creation to growth: examining agile and business planning for sustained ventures

Liudmila Tarabashkina, Noel Lindsay, Gerard Reed, Safiya Mukhtar Alshibani et al.
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

From creation to growth: examining agile and business planning for sustained ventures

Liudmila Tarabashkina, Noel Lindsay, Gerard Reed, Safiya Mukhtar Alshibani, Veland Ramadani
article en

Abstract

Purpose Agile start-up and business planning methodologies are often considered mutually exclusive, with the former traditionally applied during venture creation and the latter encouraged to raise venture capital. However, the methodologies employed by entrepreneurs beyond the venture creation stage remain unclear. This study aims to explore the methodologies used by entrepreneurs who have sustained their ventures for at least five years, identifying their implications for venture performance and sustainability. Design/methodology/approach This research employed a survey methodology, collecting data from entrepreneurs in Australia with at least five years of venture experience. The analysis identified three distinct groups: (1) “super agile,” relying exclusively on agile start-up methodology; (2) “hybridised,” combining agile start-up and business planning, and (3) “average” entrepreneurs aspiring to use both methodologies but failing to implement them effectively. Findings “Super agile” entrepreneurs reported the highest adaptability and innovation but faced challenges in scalability and investor relations. “Hybridised” entrepreneurs reported achieving the most balanced venture performance, leveraging the adaptability of agile start-ups with the structure of business planning. In contrast, “average” entrepreneurs reported lower venture performance outcomes due to inconsistent implementation of both methodologies. Practical implications The findings offer insights into the advantages and disadvantages of these methodologies in sustaining ventures and improving performance. The study provides actionable recommendations for entrepreneurs, tertiary education providers and policymakers to support the development of entrepreneurial ecosystems that enhance post-creation venture success (e.g. educating current and aspiring entrepreneurs about agile start-up and business planning to assist in post-venture creation management, finding a balance between the two methodologies if ventures have been already operational; developing tertiary or government training programs to assist entrepreneurs and provide ongoing training). Originality/value This study uniquely examines the application of agile start-up and business planning methodologies beyond the venture creation stage, contributing to the limited research on sustaining ventures over time. It highlights practical approaches that entrepreneurs can adopt to optimise venture outcomes in dynamic business environments.

International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & ResearchVol. 31(9)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), The University of Western Australia (AU), South East European University (MK), University of Canberra (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), EU Business School, Geneva (CH)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.