Seasonality in the Predictive Skill of Southwest United States Precipitation in the Seasonal Forecast Systems

Abstract We examine seasonality in the skill of 8 seasonal forecast systems to predict the Southwest United States (SWUS) precipitation between October and April. The models share similarities in the large seasonality they exhibit in their prediction skill over the 1993–2016 period: from October to December, the skill is low if not non‐existent, before it gets higher in all the models, with a peak in February‐March in the model with an extended hindcast period (European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts, ECMWF, 1981–2024 period). Using ECMWF, further analyses of daily precipitation illustrate how the model is able to better predict the SWUS precipitation over the February‐March forecast target window, versus November‐December. Higher precipitation in early February compared to early November is a contributing factor, as is the annual cycle in tropical eastern Pacific sea surface temperature, and the associated El Niño Southern Oscillation teleconnection with the extratropics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl115972
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seasonality in the Predictive Skill of Southwest United States Precipitation in the Seasonal Forecast Systems

Yannick Peings, Guðrún Magnúsdóttir, Cameron Dong
2 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
2.21
article

Seasonality in the Predictive Skill of Southwest United States Precipitation in the Seasonal Forecast Systems

Yannick Peings, Guðrún Magnúsdóttir, Cameron Dong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We examine seasonality in the skill of 8 seasonal forecast systems to predict the Southwest United States (SWUS) precipitation between October and April. The models share similarities in the large seasonality they exhibit in their prediction skill over the 1993–2016 period: from October to December, the skill is low if not non‐existent, before it gets higher in all the models, with a peak in February‐March in the model with an extended hindcast period (European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts, ECMWF, 1981–2024 period). Using ECMWF, further analyses of daily precipitation illustrate how the model is able to better predict the SWUS precipitation over the February‐March forecast target window, versus November‐December. Higher precipitation in early February compared to early November is a contributing factor, as is the annual cycle in tropical eastern Pacific sea surface temperature, and the associated El Niño Southern Oscillation teleconnection with the extratropics.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(12)
University of California, Irvine (US), Irvine University (US)
Department of Water Resources
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Climate variability and models
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.