Effects of Ceramic Shade, Ceramic Thickness, and Surface Treatment on the Color Match of High‐Translucency Monolithic Multilayer Zirconia Restorations

<b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of ceramic shade, ceramic thickness, and surface treatment on the color match of high-translucency monolithic multilayer zirconia restorations. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Seventy-two high-translucency monolithic multilayer zirconia disk specimens with different shades (A2, A3, B2, and B3) and different thicknesses (1, 1.5, and 2 mm) were fabricated, polished, and glazed. CIELab values were measured with a spectrophotometer in the incisal, middle, and cervical regions before and after glazing. ∆<i>E</i> <sub>00</sub> color differences were calculated between polished and glazed specimens (Δ<i>E</i> <sub>1</sub>), between polished specimens and their analogous Vita classical shade tabs as targets (Δ<i>E</i> <sub>2</sub>), and between glazed specimens and the targets (Δ<i>E</i> <sub>3</sub>). The ∆<i>E</i> <sub>00</sub> values were compared with a 50:50% acceptability threshold (∆<i>E</i> <sub>00</sub> = 1.8) to assess color matches. Repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni, and 1-sample <i>t</i>-tests were used for data analysis (<i>α</i> = 0.05). <b>Results:</b> Mean ∆<i>E</i> <sub>00</sub> values ranged between 1.11 and 2.74 for Δ<i>E</i> <sub>1</sub>, between 2.69 and 6.78 for Δ<i>E</i> <sub>2</sub>, and between 1.47 and 5.59 for Δ<i>E</i> <sub>3</sub>. The overall mean values were 1.82, 4.66, and 3.63 for Δ<i>E</i> <sub>1</sub>, Δ<i>E</i> <sub>2</sub>, and Δ<i>E</i> <sub>3</sub>, respectively. Ceramic shade, ceramic thickness, and surface treatment significantly affected the CIELab values (<i>p</i> < 0.05). All mean ∆<i>E</i> <sub>2</sub> and ∆<i>E</i> <sub>3</sub> values were greater than the threshold (<i>p</i> < 0.05) except for the mean ∆<i>E</i> <sub>3</sub> for the 1.5- and 2-mm-thick, A3 shade, glazed zirconia in the cervical region (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> The color match of high-translucency monolithic multilayer zirconia restorations depends on ceramic shade. Additionally, increased ceramic thicknesses (≥1.5 mm) and glazing can improve the color match of these restorations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Dentistry
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/2004922
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Pigment Synthesis and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Ceramic Shade, Ceramic Thickness, and Surface Treatment on the Color Match of High‐Translucency Monolithic Multilayer Zirconia Restorations

Shahriar Mirabbasi, Farhad Tabatabaian, Siddharth R. Vora
5 citations
International Journal of Dentistry
Pigment Synthesis and Properties
2.69
article

Effects of Ceramic Shade, Ceramic Thickness, and Surface Treatment on the Color Match of High‐Translucency Monolithic Multilayer Zirconia Restorations

Shahriar Mirabbasi, Farhad Tabatabaian, Siddharth R. Vora
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of ceramic shade, ceramic thickness, and surface treatment on the color match of high-translucency monolithic multilayer zirconia restorations. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Seventy-two high-translucency monolithic multilayer zirconia disk specimens with different shades (A2, A3, B2, and B3) and different thicknesses (1, 1.5, and 2 mm) were fabricated, polished, and glazed. CIELab values were measured with a spectrophotometer in the incisal, middle, and cervical regions before and after glazing. ∆<i>E</i> <sub>00</sub> color differences were calculated between polished and glazed specimens (Δ<i>E</i> <sub>1</sub>), between polished specimens and their analogous Vita classical shade tabs as targets (Δ<i>E</i> <sub>2</sub>), and between glazed specimens and the targets (Δ<i>E</i> <sub>3</sub>). The ∆<i>E</i> <sub>00</sub> values were compared with a 50:50% acceptability threshold (∆<i>E</i> <sub>00</sub> = 1.8) to assess color matches. Repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni, and 1-sample <i>t</i>-tests were used for data analysis (<i>α</i> = 0.05). <b>Results:</b> Mean ∆<i>E</i> <sub>00</sub> values ranged between 1.11 and 2.74 for Δ<i>E</i> <sub>1</sub>, between 2.69 and 6.78 for Δ<i>E</i> <sub>2</sub>, and between 1.47 and 5.59 for Δ<i>E</i> <sub>3</sub>. The overall mean values were 1.82, 4.66, and 3.63 for Δ<i>E</i> <sub>1</sub>, Δ<i>E</i> <sub>2</sub>, and Δ<i>E</i> <sub>3</sub>, respectively. Ceramic shade, ceramic thickness, and surface treatment significantly affected the CIELab values (<i>p</i> < 0.05). All mean ∆<i>E</i> <sub>2</sub> and ∆<i>E</i> <sub>3</sub> values were greater than the threshold (<i>p</i> < 0.05) except for the mean ∆<i>E</i> <sub>3</sub> for the 1.5- and 2-mm-thick, A3 shade, glazed zirconia in the cervical region (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> The color match of high-translucency monolithic multilayer zirconia restorations depends on ceramic shade. Additionally, increased ceramic thicknesses (≥1.5 mm) and glazing can improve the color match of these restorations.

International Journal of DentistryVol. 2025(1)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pigment Synthesis and Properties
2.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.