Exploring L2 postgraduate students’ engagement with supervisor feedback in academic writing

While studies on student engagement with teacher feedback have proliferated, these investigations have mainly focused on undergraduate students in non-academic writing contexts with limited participants. Consequently, little is known about how second language (L2) postgraduate students engaged with their supervisors’ feedback in academic writing. To fill this important gap, we employed a mixed-methods approach to examine how L2 postgraduates engaged with supervisor feedback affectively, behaviorally, and cognitively in academic writing. In our study, we collected data from multiple sources including questionnaires, students’ first and revised writing samples, supervisors’ feedback, semi-structured interviews, and stimulated recalls. The analyses of quantitative and qualitative data showed that the participants generally engaged with their supervisors’ feedback and related activities actively and profoundly in affective, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions. We conclude our study with a discussion on the important pedagogical implications these findings can offer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Teaching Research
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251343987
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring L2 postgraduate students’ engagement with supervisor feedback in academic writing

Xiaolong Cheng, Lawrence Jun Zhang, Timothy J. E. Neufeld
1 citations
Language Teaching Research
Student Assessment and Feedback
8.93
article

Exploring L2 postgraduate students’ engagement with supervisor feedback in academic writing

Xiaolong Cheng, Lawrence Jun Zhang, Timothy J. E. Neufeld
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While studies on student engagement with teacher feedback have proliferated, these investigations have mainly focused on undergraduate students in non-academic writing contexts with limited participants. Consequently, little is known about how second language (L2) postgraduate students engaged with their supervisors’ feedback in academic writing. To fill this important gap, we employed a mixed-methods approach to examine how L2 postgraduates engaged with supervisor feedback affectively, behaviorally, and cognitively in academic writing. In our study, we collected data from multiple sources including questionnaires, students’ first and revised writing samples, supervisors’ feedback, semi-structured interviews, and stimulated recalls. The analyses of quantitative and qualitative data showed that the participants generally engaged with their supervisors’ feedback and related activities actively and profoundly in affective, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions. We conclude our study with a discussion on the important pedagogical implications these findings can offer.

Language Teaching Research
University of Auckland (NZ), Hubei University of Technology (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Student Assessment and Feedback
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.