The Soviet Nomenclature: From Professional Revolutionaries to Quasi Elite (Remarks on a Current Discussion)

The Soviet Union is long gone but the memory of it is still alive. And not only the memory of it, but also the way of thinking and acting. The question here is: what makes a country – no matter how it is called and who governs is to function in the same way? Who is the holder/ subject of the historical information who puts it into practice? The articles aims at answering these questions by funneling the attention into the historical route of an important for the country class, namely the Soviet nomenklatura and the way it gradually becomes part of the government of the Russian Federation. Every leader of the country has a different position regarding it and leaves its footprint on shaping it. The result is a political class that transformed from professional revolutionaries to quasi-elite, whose actions are not led by Russia’s welfare but by its own interests not only for a particular period of time but as a well-established way of thinking. An attempt was made to trace the formation of the nomenklatura mentality and how it became a role model for the political elites that followed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Epohi
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54664/dmtk3382
Primary Topic
Russia and Soviet political economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Soviet Nomenclature: From Professional Revolutionaries to Quasi Elite (Remarks on a Current Discussion)

Asya Atanasova
Epohi
Russia and Soviet political economy
article

The Soviet Nomenclature: From Professional Revolutionaries to Quasi Elite (Remarks on a Current Discussion)

Asya Atanasova
article en

Abstract

The Soviet Union is long gone but the memory of it is still alive. And not only the memory of it, but also the way of thinking and acting. The question here is: what makes a country – no matter how it is called and who governs is to function in the same way? Who is the holder/ subject of the historical information who puts it into practice? The articles aims at answering these questions by funneling the attention into the historical route of an important for the country class, namely the Soviet nomenklatura and the way it gradually becomes part of the government of the Russian Federation. Every leader of the country has a different position regarding it and leaves its footprint on shaping it. The result is a political class that transformed from professional revolutionaries to quasi-elite, whose actions are not led by Russia’s welfare but by its own interests not only for a particular period of time but as a well-established way of thinking. An attempt was made to trace the formation of the nomenklatura mentality and how it became a role model for the political elites that followed.

EpohiVol. 33(1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Russia and Soviet political economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Soviet Nomenclature: From Professional Revolutionaries to Quasi Elite (Remarks on a Current Discussion) — Asya Atanasova · Epohi (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS