Horizontal Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) in Ethiopia: normative and empirical considerations

Horizontal Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) have been paid little attention in many federations, and the practice of governing them through a formal IGR Act is uncommon, although politics of interstate relations directly affect thousands of business firms and millions of citizens. This paper uses the Ethiopian Federation as a case study to explore how interstate relations are governed and practiced. The research used a qualitative approach. The findings illustrate that most interstate relations had faced difficulties in operating and fulfilling their stated missions, with most being inactive. This study suggested that informal interstate agreements have failed to address the substantive issues faced by states in their bilateral relations. The problems with the informal horizontal practice of IGR led to the institutionalization of horizontal IGR forums via the 2021 IGR Law. As this law has yet to be fully operationalized, it is unclear if this experiment in institutionalizing horizontal IGR will succeed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional & Federal Studies
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2025.2519918
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Horizontal Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) in Ethiopia: normative and empirical considerations

Nigussie Afesha, Hazel Barrett
1 citations
Regional & Federal Studies
Political Systems and Governance
8.52
article

Horizontal Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) in Ethiopia: normative and empirical considerations

Nigussie Afesha, Hazel Barrett
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Horizontal Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) have been paid little attention in many federations, and the practice of governing them through a formal IGR Act is uncommon, although politics of interstate relations directly affect thousands of business firms and millions of citizens. This paper uses the Ethiopian Federation as a case study to explore how interstate relations are governed and practiced. The research used a qualitative approach. The findings illustrate that most interstate relations had faced difficulties in operating and fulfilling their stated missions, with most being inactive. This study suggested that informal interstate agreements have failed to address the substantive issues faced by states in their bilateral relations. The problems with the informal horizontal practice of IGR led to the institutionalization of horizontal IGR forums via the 2021 IGR Law. As this law has yet to be fully operationalized, it is unclear if this experiment in institutionalizing horizontal IGR will succeed.

Regional & Federal StudiesVol. 36(2)
Hawassa University (ET), Coventry University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Political Systems and Governance
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Horizontal Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) in Ethiopia: normative and empirical considerations — Nigussie Afesha, Hazel Barrett · Regional & Federal Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS