Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet Among Urban and Rural Latin American Adolescents: Associations with Micronutrient Intake and Ultra-Processed Food Consumption
<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Adolescents in Latin America are experiencing rising rates of overweight/obesity and non-communicable diseases, while public health nutrition efforts targeting this group remain limited. This study explores adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and its relationship with micronutrient adequacy and ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption. <b>Methods:</b> Cross-sectional data from national nutrition surveys of 19,601 adolescents across six Latin American countries were analyzed. Data on sociodemographics, anthropometrics, and dietary habits were collected using standardized questionnaires and 24 h dietary recalls or food records. Nutrient intake was estimated via statistical modeling, and nutrient adequacy ratios were based on age- and sex-specific requirements. UPF intake was classified using the NOVA system, and adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was assessed with the Planetary Health Diet Index. <b>Results:</b> Overall adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was low (mean score: 28.3%). Rural adolescents had higher adherence than urban adolescents, and those aged 10-13 and 17-19 showed better adherence compared to adolescents aged 14-16. Adolescents from lower socioeconomic backgrounds adhered more than those from higher socioeconomic backgrounds. Adherence varied from 20.2% in Argentina to 30.2% in Brazil and Chile. Higher adherence was associated with lower UPF intake. Among urban adolescents, greater adherence was linked to a higher risk of inadequate riboflavin, niacin, and cobalamin intake, a trend not observed in rural adolescents. <b>Conclusions:</b> Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet is low among Latin American adolescents, particularly in urban areas. Public health efforts should prioritize reducing UPF consumption, improving access to nutrient-dense, culturally appropriate foods, and supporting fortified staple foods.
Authors
- Tito Pizarro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2514-0072)
- Rafael Monge‐Rojas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7660-2508)
- Leandro Teixeira Cacau (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1681-5960)
- Sonia Rodríguez‐Ramírez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5439-4389)
- Alicia Rovirosa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7793-343X)
- Tania G Sánchez-Pimienta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-0047)
- María Elisa Zapata (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4853-4998)
- Diego Gaitán-Charry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1600-3658)
- Gustavo Cediel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9968-2408)
- Jacqueline Araneda‐Flores (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0415-2920)
- Anna Christina Pinheiro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5188-2619)
- Rulamán Vargas-Quesada (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5944-3071)
Institutions
- Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL)
- Universidad del Desarrollo (CL)
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- University of Bío-Bío (CL)
- Clínica Alemana (CL)
- Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
- Universidad Bernardo O'Higgins (CL)
- Instituto Costarricense de Investigación y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud (CR)
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nutrients
- Published
- 2025-06-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17122048
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 7.51