Improving Porosity Calculation Methods and Proposing a New Model Universally Applicable to Large- and Medium-sized Planetary Objects

Abstract Our work was aimed at the improvement of two main already existing methods of porosity calculation on a planetary scale in order to expand these methods to be applicable to exoplanetary interiors. In addition to implementing some improvements in the used approach, we also wanted to provide a new, more sophisticated model with the combination of the two base models. Utilizing our combined model we aimed to provide results regarding the porosity structure of the interior of four planetary bodies of the solar system (Enceladus, Earth, Mars, and the Moon), chosen as case studies. Taking a method that is based on fitted functions to experimental data from geological environments, and a separate method based on the temporal evolution of planetary interiors governed by thermodynamic processes, we developed a combined model, which incorporates the advantages of both base models. The proposed new model produced a pore compaction depth of 62.52 km for the core of Enceladus, 4.5 km for Earth, 19.96 km for Mars, and 32.51 km for the Moon. Moreover, we have discovered differing trends between the effect of changes in geothermal gradient and surface temperatures across planetary objects of different sizes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/add723
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Porosity Calculation Methods and Proposing a New Model Universally Applicable to Large- and Medium-sized Planetary Objects

Ákos Keresztúri, Imre Kisvárdai
The Astrophysical Journal
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

Improving Porosity Calculation Methods and Proposing a New Model Universally Applicable to Large- and Medium-sized Planetary Objects

Ákos Keresztúri, Imre Kisvárdai
article en

Abstract

Abstract Our work was aimed at the improvement of two main already existing methods of porosity calculation on a planetary scale in order to expand these methods to be applicable to exoplanetary interiors. In addition to implementing some improvements in the used approach, we also wanted to provide a new, more sophisticated model with the combination of the two base models. Utilizing our combined model we aimed to provide results regarding the porosity structure of the interior of four planetary bodies of the solar system (Enceladus, Earth, Mars, and the Moon), chosen as case studies. Taking a method that is based on fitted functions to experimental data from geological environments, and a separate method based on the temporal evolution of planetary interiors governed by thermodynamic processes, we developed a combined model, which incorporates the advantages of both base models. The proposed new model produced a pore compaction depth of 62.52 km for the core of Enceladus, 4.5 km for Earth, 19.96 km for Mars, and 32.51 km for the Moon. Moreover, we have discovered differing trends between the effect of changes in geothermal gradient and surface temperatures across planetary objects of different sizes.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 986(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improving Porosity Calculation Methods and Proposing a New Model Universally Applicable to Large- and Medium-sized Planetary Objects — Ákos Keresztúri, Imre Kisvárdai · The Astrophysical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS