Validity Study on the Students’ Attitudes Toward Mathematics Scale for English-Speaking Countries

This article focuses on the validity of the students’ attitudes toward mathematics scale based on data from TIMSS 2019. The scale has been reported as having a three-factor structure for decades, but this study assumes the validity can appear differently depending on the country or culture. Thus, the scale should first be checked for invariance between countries. This study selected five English-speaking countries to prevent translation effects. The results of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) indicate that the factor loading values of the two items were below 0.4 in more than four countries. The EFA model with the two items deleted had a greater fit than the others in all countries using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). A metric invariance model based on the EFA results showed the greatest fit when using multiple-group CFA. The findings suggest that two items may need revision, and the results must be interpreted considering differences in students’ cultural backgrounds, even though the questionnaires were administered in the same language, which warrants further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251339984
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity Study on the Students’ Attitudes Toward Mathematics Scale for English-Speaking Countries

Youn‐Jeng Choi, Hyeonsuk Choi
1 citations
SAGE Open
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
2.11
article

Validity Study on the Students’ Attitudes Toward Mathematics Scale for English-Speaking Countries

Youn‐Jeng Choi, Hyeonsuk Choi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article focuses on the validity of the students’ attitudes toward mathematics scale based on data from TIMSS 2019. The scale has been reported as having a three-factor structure for decades, but this study assumes the validity can appear differently depending on the country or culture. Thus, the scale should first be checked for invariance between countries. This study selected five English-speaking countries to prevent translation effects. The results of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) indicate that the factor loading values of the two items were below 0.4 in more than four countries. The EFA model with the two items deleted had a greater fit than the others in all countries using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). A metric invariance model based on the EFA results showed the greatest fit when using multiple-group CFA. The findings suggest that two items may need revision, and the results must be interpreted considering differences in students’ cultural backgrounds, even though the questionnaires were administered in the same language, which warrants further research.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(2)
Ewha Womans University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validity Study on the Students’ Attitudes Toward Mathematics Scale for English-Speaking Countries — Youn‐Jeng Choi, Hyeonsuk Choi · SAGE Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS