A Comparison of Cement and Guar Gum Stabilisation of Oxford Clay Under Controlled Wetting and Drying Cycles

Climate-induced wetting and drying (WD) cycles significantly affect the long-term performance of geotechnical structures. This study explores expansive Oxford clay’s mechanical and volumetric responses stabilised with ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and guar gum (GG) under repeated WD cycles. We prepared 108 samples in total—36 untreated, 36 treated with OPC, and 36 treated with GG. These samples were compacted to 90% of their maximum dry density and subjected to 1, 5, 10, and 15 WD cycles, with nine samples for each treatment at each cycle. During the WD cycles, we monitored volumetric strain and moisture content. Mechanical performance was assessed through unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests conducted at matric suctions of −1500 kPa, −33 kPa, and under saturated conditions. We evaluated the undrained shear strength (Su), secant modulus of elasticity (E50), and modulus of toughness (Ut). The results showed that OPC-treated samples consistently exhibited the highest Su at −1500 kPa across all WD cycles, followed by untreated and GG-treated samples. At −33 kPa, OPC-treated samples again outperformed the others in Su, while GG-treated samples performed better than the untreated ones. Under saturated conditions, GG-treated samples displayed a similar Su to OPC-treated samples, significantly higher than untreated samples. Energy absorption capacity, measured through Ut, peaked for OPC-treated samples at −1500 kPa but favoured GG treatment at −33 kPa and under saturation. X-ray computed tomography (CT) revealed severe degradation in untreated samples, characterised by extensive cracking, minor cracking in OPC-treated samples, and minimal damage in GG-treated samples. This highlights the superior resilience of guar gum to wetting–drying cycles. These findings underscore the potential of guar gum as a sustainable alternative to cement for enhancing the WD resilience of expansive soils, particularly under low-suction or saturated conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126913
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Cement and Guar Gum Stabilisation of Oxford Clay Under Controlled Wetting and Drying Cycles

Kanishka Sauis Turrakheil, Syed Samran Ali Shah, Muhammad Naveed
2 citations
Applied Sciences
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
1.91
article

A Comparison of Cement and Guar Gum Stabilisation of Oxford Clay Under Controlled Wetting and Drying Cycles

Kanishka Sauis Turrakheil, Syed Samran Ali Shah, Muhammad Naveed
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Climate-induced wetting and drying (WD) cycles significantly affect the long-term performance of geotechnical structures. This study explores expansive Oxford clay’s mechanical and volumetric responses stabilised with ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and guar gum (GG) under repeated WD cycles. We prepared 108 samples in total—36 untreated, 36 treated with OPC, and 36 treated with GG. These samples were compacted to 90% of their maximum dry density and subjected to 1, 5, 10, and 15 WD cycles, with nine samples for each treatment at each cycle. During the WD cycles, we monitored volumetric strain and moisture content. Mechanical performance was assessed through unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests conducted at matric suctions of −1500 kPa, −33 kPa, and under saturated conditions. We evaluated the undrained shear strength (Su), secant modulus of elasticity (E50), and modulus of toughness (Ut). The results showed that OPC-treated samples consistently exhibited the highest Su at −1500 kPa across all WD cycles, followed by untreated and GG-treated samples. At −33 kPa, OPC-treated samples again outperformed the others in Su, while GG-treated samples performed better than the untreated ones. Under saturated conditions, GG-treated samples displayed a similar Su to OPC-treated samples, significantly higher than untreated samples. Energy absorption capacity, measured through Ut, peaked for OPC-treated samples at −1500 kPa but favoured GG treatment at −33 kPa and under saturation. X-ray computed tomography (CT) revealed severe degradation in untreated samples, characterised by extensive cracking, minor cracking in OPC-treated samples, and minimal damage in GG-treated samples. This highlights the superior resilience of guar gum to wetting–drying cycles. These findings underscore the potential of guar gum as a sustainable alternative to cement for enhancing the WD resilience of expansive soils, particularly under low-suction or saturated conditions.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(12)
University of West London (GB)
University of West London, University of Southampton, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.