Significance of Spring Inflow to Great Salt Lake, Utah, U.S.A.

Spring waters (n = 103) from locations surrounding Great Salt Lake (GSL) were mapped, collected, and analyzed to determine their chemical compositions. A ternary Ca-SO4-alkalinity plot was used to group these waters into compositional types based on the principle of chemical divides. Different spring water types were mixed with Bear, Jordan, and Weber River waters to determine the amount of spring inflow needed to reproduce the chemical composition of GSL. The Pitzer-based computer program EQL/EVP was used to simulate evaporation of spring-river water mixtures. The goal was to find spring-river water mixtures that, when evaporated, reproduced the chemical composition of modern GSL. This approach yielded GSL brine composition from a starting mixture of 12% spring inflow and 88% river water, by volume. The calculated spring inflow–river water mixture contains, on a molar percentage basis, greater than 50% of the B, K, Li, Na, and Cl supplied by springs and greater than 50% of the Ba, Ca, Sr, SO4, and alkalinity derived from rivers. Understanding GSL spring inflow and brine evolution as lake elevation drops is critical to lake environments, ecosystems, and industrial brine shrimp harvesting and mineral extraction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12060159
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Significance of Spring Inflow to Great Salt Lake, Utah, U.S.A.

Tim K. Lowenstein, Lauren E. Bunce, David C. Collins, Elliot Jagniecki
1 citations
Hydrology
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
0.82
article

Significance of Spring Inflow to Great Salt Lake, Utah, U.S.A.

Tim K. Lowenstein, Lauren E. Bunce, David C. Collins, Elliot Jagniecki
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Spring waters (n = 103) from locations surrounding Great Salt Lake (GSL) were mapped, collected, and analyzed to determine their chemical compositions. A ternary Ca-SO4-alkalinity plot was used to group these waters into compositional types based on the principle of chemical divides. Different spring water types were mixed with Bear, Jordan, and Weber River waters to determine the amount of spring inflow needed to reproduce the chemical composition of GSL. The Pitzer-based computer program EQL/EVP was used to simulate evaporation of spring-river water mixtures. The goal was to find spring-river water mixtures that, when evaporated, reproduced the chemical composition of modern GSL. This approach yielded GSL brine composition from a starting mixture of 12% spring inflow and 88% river water, by volume. The calculated spring inflow–river water mixture contains, on a molar percentage basis, greater than 50% of the B, K, Li, Na, and Cl supplied by springs and greater than 50% of the Ba, Ca, Sr, SO4, and alkalinity derived from rivers. Understanding GSL spring inflow and brine evolution as lake elevation drops is critical to lake environments, ecosystems, and industrial brine shrimp harvesting and mineral extraction.

HydrologyVol. 12(6)
Binghamton University (US), Utah Geological Survey (US)
Society for Sedimentary Geology, Society of Economic Geologists Foundation, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Foundation
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.