How Does Self‐Declared Chronic Pain Compare to Other Definitions? A Prospective Multicenter Study

<b>Background:</b> Self-declared chronic pain has not been compared to existing definitions. Our objective was to evaluate the agreement between self-declared chronic pain and different chronic pain definitions, three months after an emergency department (ED) visit. <b>Methods:</b> In this planned substudy of a prospective multicenter cohort study, we included consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years with an acute pain condition discharged from the ED with an opioid prescription. Three months after their ED visit, participants were asked about their pain intensity, pain frequency, pain disability, and self-declared chronic pain. Agreement between self-declared chronic pain and five other definitions were calculated with kappas. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1411 participants were included; mean age was 52 (±16) years, and 53% were female. Prevalence of self-declared chronic pain was 23.0% and varied from 16.9% to 45.3% for other definitions. Agreement of self-declared chronic pain was moderate (0.57-0.60) with most definitions but lower with the pain intensity ≥ 1 definition (0.47). The proportion of chronic pain participants using opioids ( ⁓20%) or other analgesics (⁓80%) was similar with all definitions except for the pain intensity ≥ 1 definition which was associated with a lower proportion of analgesic use (11%, 64%). <b>Conclusion:</b> In summary, self-declared chronic pain displayed moderate agreement with other chronic pain definitions and similar analgesic consumption but lower with the pain intensity ≥ 1 definition. Nonetheless, chronic pain prevalence varied greatly depending on how it was defined. Self-declared chronic pain might be a more patient-centered outcome and could be easily applied to standardize chronic pain definition. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03953534.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain Research and Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/5556400
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Does Self‐Declared Chronic Pain Compare to Other Definitions? A Prospective Multicenter Study

Jean Paquet, Alexis Cournoyer, Jeffrey J. Perry, David R. Williamson et al.
1 citations
Pain Research and Management
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
article

How Does Self‐Declared Chronic Pain Compare to Other Definitions? A Prospective Multicenter Study

Jean Paquet, Alexis Cournoyer, Jeffrey J. Perry, David R. Williamson, Dominique M. Rouleau, Justin W. Yan, Véronique Castonguay, Justine Lessard, Gilles Lavigne, Raoul Daoust
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Self-declared chronic pain has not been compared to existing definitions. Our objective was to evaluate the agreement between self-declared chronic pain and different chronic pain definitions, three months after an emergency department (ED) visit. <b>Methods:</b> In this planned substudy of a prospective multicenter cohort study, we included consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years with an acute pain condition discharged from the ED with an opioid prescription. Three months after their ED visit, participants were asked about their pain intensity, pain frequency, pain disability, and self-declared chronic pain. Agreement between self-declared chronic pain and five other definitions were calculated with kappas. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1411 participants were included; mean age was 52 (±16) years, and 53% were female. Prevalence of self-declared chronic pain was 23.0% and varied from 16.9% to 45.3% for other definitions. Agreement of self-declared chronic pain was moderate (0.57-0.60) with most definitions but lower with the pain intensity ≥ 1 definition (0.47). The proportion of chronic pain participants using opioids ( ⁓20%) or other analgesics (⁓80%) was similar with all definitions except for the pain intensity ≥ 1 definition which was associated with a lower proportion of analgesic use (11%, 64%). <b>Conclusion:</b> In summary, self-declared chronic pain displayed moderate agreement with other chronic pain definitions and similar analgesic consumption but lower with the pain intensity ≥ 1 definition. Nonetheless, chronic pain prevalence varied greatly depending on how it was defined. Self-declared chronic pain might be a more patient-centered outcome and could be easily applied to standardize chronic pain definition. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03953534.

Pain Research and ManagementVol. 2025(1)
Western University (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), London Health Sciences Centre (CA), Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.