Adhesion of 3D-Printed Versus Milled Resin Posts to Composite Resin Core Build-Up Material: Influence of Surface Treatments

<b>Background:</b> There are very few studies in literature concerning the bonding between 3D-printed resin posts and the core build-up material. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the adhesion of 3D-printed and milled resin posts to composite resin core build-up material following different surface treatments. <b>Methods:</b> Three types of resin posts were utilized in this study: ready-made glass-reinforced fiber post (3M ESPE, Germany), milled PEEK POST (Bredent, Germany), and 3D-printed resin post (CROWNTEC, Saremco Dental AG, Switzerland). Each type of post was categorized into three groups based on surface treatments: C: untreated surfaces; SB: Air abrasion with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles was applied to the posts' surfaces.; HO: the posts' surfaces were immersed in 30% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for 5 min. A dual-cured composite resin (Grandio DC; VOCO) was utilized for core build-up in each group to evaluate adhesion through the push-out bond strength test. The modes of failure were analyzed, and the surface morphology of the post was characterized using SEM. Data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) along with Tukey's test. <b>Results:</b> The two-way ANOVA indicated a significant effect for surface treatment (F = 583.54, <i>p</i> < 001), post type (F = 79.96, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and their interactions (F = 265.74, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Regarding 3D-printed resin post, 30% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for 5 min recorded the highest statistically significant bond strength value (13.11 ± 1.61) compared to other groups. Regarding the milled PEEK post, the air particle abrasion recorded the highest statistically significant value (23.88 ± 1.66) compared to other groups. Adhesive failure was the predominant failure type, with an occurrence rate of 70.35%. Mixed failure was noted in 24.07% of the cases, with a significant prevalence in the PEEK post within the air particle abrasion group (58.3%). Cohesive failure was noted in 5.54% of cases, with a significant prevalence in the air particle abrasion group, occurring at rates of 16.6% in the resin fiber post group and 33.3% in PEEK posts. <b>Conclusions:</b> Air particle abrasion significantly improved the push-out bond strength of milled PEEK posts, but it did not have a similar effect on the 3D-printed resin posts. The application of 30% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for 5 min to 3D-printed resin post enhanced the adhesion to core build-up material. The manufacturing method of posts, the surface treatments utilized, and their interactions affect the interfacial bond strength between posts and the composite resin core build-up material.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17121711
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adhesion of 3D-Printed Versus Milled Resin Posts to Composite Resin Core Build-Up Material: Influence of Surface Treatments

Abdulellah Almudahi, Tarek Ahmed Soliman, Khalid K. Alanazi, Ali Robaian et al.
1 citations
Polymers
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.68
article

Adhesion of 3D-Printed Versus Milled Resin Posts to Composite Resin Core Build-Up Material: Influence of Surface Treatments

Abdulellah Almudahi, Tarek Ahmed Soliman, Khalid K. Alanazi, Ali Robaian, Abdullah Alshehri, Omar Almansour, Sultan Alqahtani, Abdullah Ali Alqahtani, Nawaf Abdullah Hussein AlHarbi, Eman Mohamed Raffat Hussein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> There are very few studies in literature concerning the bonding between 3D-printed resin posts and the core build-up material. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the adhesion of 3D-printed and milled resin posts to composite resin core build-up material following different surface treatments. <b>Methods:</b> Three types of resin posts were utilized in this study: ready-made glass-reinforced fiber post (3M ESPE, Germany), milled PEEK POST (Bredent, Germany), and 3D-printed resin post (CROWNTEC, Saremco Dental AG, Switzerland). Each type of post was categorized into three groups based on surface treatments: C: untreated surfaces; SB: Air abrasion with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles was applied to the posts' surfaces.; HO: the posts' surfaces were immersed in 30% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for 5 min. A dual-cured composite resin (Grandio DC; VOCO) was utilized for core build-up in each group to evaluate adhesion through the push-out bond strength test. The modes of failure were analyzed, and the surface morphology of the post was characterized using SEM. Data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) along with Tukey's test. <b>Results:</b> The two-way ANOVA indicated a significant effect for surface treatment (F = 583.54, <i>p</i> < 001), post type (F = 79.96, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and their interactions (F = 265.74, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Regarding 3D-printed resin post, 30% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for 5 min recorded the highest statistically significant bond strength value (13.11 ± 1.61) compared to other groups. Regarding the milled PEEK post, the air particle abrasion recorded the highest statistically significant value (23.88 ± 1.66) compared to other groups. Adhesive failure was the predominant failure type, with an occurrence rate of 70.35%. Mixed failure was noted in 24.07% of the cases, with a significant prevalence in the PEEK post within the air particle abrasion group (58.3%). Cohesive failure was noted in 5.54% of cases, with a significant prevalence in the air particle abrasion group, occurring at rates of 16.6% in the resin fiber post group and 33.3% in PEEK posts. <b>Conclusions:</b> Air particle abrasion significantly improved the push-out bond strength of milled PEEK posts, but it did not have a similar effect on the 3D-printed resin posts. The application of 30% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for 5 min to 3D-printed resin post enhanced the adhesion to core build-up material. The manufacturing method of posts, the surface treatments utilized, and their interactions affect the interfacial bond strength between posts and the composite resin core build-up material.

PolymersVol. 17(12)
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), Mansoura University (EG), Benha University (EG), Ministry of Health (SA)
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.