Partial ruptures governed by the complex interplay between geodetic slip deficit, rigidity, and pore fluid pressure in 3D Cascadia dynamic rupture simulations

Physics-based dynamic rupture simulations are valuable for assessing the seismic hazard in the Cascadia subduction zone (CSZ), but require assumptions about fault stress and material properties. Geodetic slip deficit models (SDMs) may provide information about the initial stresses governing megathrust earthquake dynamics. We present a unified workflow linking SDMs to 3D dynamic rupture simulations, and 22 rupture scenarios to unravel the dynamic trade-offs of assumptions for SDMs, rigidity, and pore fluid pressure. We find that margin-wide rupture, an earthquake that ruptures the entire length of the plate boundary, requires a large slip deficit in the central CSZ. Comparisons between Gaussian and smoother, shallow-coupled SDMs show significant differences in stress distributions and rupture dynamics. Variations in depth-dependent rigidity cause competing effects, particularly in the near-trench region. Higher overall rigidity can increase fault slip but also result in lower initial shear stresses, inhibiting slip. The state of pore fluid pressure is crucial in balancing SDM-informed initial shear stresses with realistic dynamic rupture processes, especially assuming small recurrence time scaling factors. This study highlights the importance of self-consistent assumptions for rigidity and initial stresses between geodetic, structural, and dynamic rupture models, providing a foundation for future simulations of ground motions and tsunami generation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seismica
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v2i4.1427
Citations
4
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partial ruptures governed by the complex interplay between geodetic slip deficit, rigidity, and pore fluid pressure in 3D Cascadia dynamic rupture simulations

Alice‐Agnes Gabriel, Eric O. Lindsey, Marlon Ramos, Thomas Ulrich et al.
4 citations
Seismica
earthquake and tectonic studies
7.47
article

Partial ruptures governed by the complex interplay between geodetic slip deficit, rigidity, and pore fluid pressure in 3D Cascadia dynamic rupture simulations

Alice‐Agnes Gabriel, Eric O. Lindsey, Marlon Ramos, Thomas Ulrich, Yihe Huang, Jonatan Glehman
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Physics-based dynamic rupture simulations are valuable for assessing the seismic hazard in the Cascadia subduction zone (CSZ), but require assumptions about fault stress and material properties. Geodetic slip deficit models (SDMs) may provide information about the initial stresses governing megathrust earthquake dynamics. We present a unified workflow linking SDMs to 3D dynamic rupture simulations, and 22 rupture scenarios to unravel the dynamic trade-offs of assumptions for SDMs, rigidity, and pore fluid pressure. We find that margin-wide rupture, an earthquake that ruptures the entire length of the plate boundary, requires a large slip deficit in the central CSZ. Comparisons between Gaussian and smoother, shallow-coupled SDMs show significant differences in stress distributions and rupture dynamics. Variations in depth-dependent rigidity cause competing effects, particularly in the near-trench region. Higher overall rigidity can increase fault slip but also result in lower initial shear stresses, inhibiting slip. The state of pore fluid pressure is crucial in balancing SDM-informed initial shear stresses with realistic dynamic rupture processes, especially assuming small recurrence time scaling factors. This study highlights the importance of self-consistent assumptions for rigidity and initial stresses between geodetic, structural, and dynamic rupture models, providing a foundation for future simulations of ground motions and tsunami generation.

SeismicaVol. 2(4)
Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), University of New Mexico (US), University of Michigan (US), University of California San Diego (US), Sandia National Laboratories (US), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Horizon 2020, HORIZON EUROPE Reforming and enhancing the European Research and Innovation system
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
earthquake and tectonic studies
7.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.