Guidelines for learning design and assessment for generative artificial intelligence-integrated education: a unified view

Purpose The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in education have significantly impacted learning, teaching and assessment practices. This development has raised critical questions about necessary changes to learning design and traditional assessment methods for a society where GenAI becomes embedded in both learning and work environments. This paper aims to investigate the extent of global consensus on learning design and assessment for GenAI-integrated learning environments. Design/methodology/approach This study’s policy analysis approach follows Nguyen et al. (2023) by mapping and analysing current policies and guidelines from intergovernmental organisations. This study conducts a comprehensive review of policies and guidelines relevant to learning design and assessment for GenAI-integrated education, highlighting key competencies, ethical principles and implementation guidelines. Findings This paper presents an integrated perspective on the key skills and competencies needed for learning with GenAI, alongside strategies for designing effective GenAI-integrated learning experiences. The study findings highlight the need to rethink conventional assessment goals and methods to capture the full range of learning gains enabled by GenAI. Originality/value While recent guidelines have begun to address GenAI’s role in education, there remains ongoing debate over the foundational principles needed to design meaningful learning and assessment in this new context. The proposed integrated framework offers practical guidance for educators and policymakers while also laying the groundwork for future research on the pedagogical and systemic impacts of GenAI integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Learning Sciences
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-11-2024-0148
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines for learning design and assessment for generative artificial intelligence-integrated education: a unified view

Van Thi Thanh Lai, Anh Duong, Belle Dang, Diem Thi Nguyen et al.
8 citations
Information and Learning Sciences
Online Learning and Analytics
13.55
article

Guidelines for learning design and assessment for generative artificial intelligence-integrated education: a unified view

Van Thi Thanh Lai, Anh Duong, Belle Dang, Diem Thi Nguyen, Andy Nguyen
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Purpose The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in education have significantly impacted learning, teaching and assessment practices. This development has raised critical questions about necessary changes to learning design and traditional assessment methods for a society where GenAI becomes embedded in both learning and work environments. This paper aims to investigate the extent of global consensus on learning design and assessment for GenAI-integrated learning environments. Design/methodology/approach This study’s policy analysis approach follows Nguyen et al. (2023) by mapping and analysing current policies and guidelines from intergovernmental organisations. This study conducts a comprehensive review of policies and guidelines relevant to learning design and assessment for GenAI-integrated education, highlighting key competencies, ethical principles and implementation guidelines. Findings This paper presents an integrated perspective on the key skills and competencies needed for learning with GenAI, alongside strategies for designing effective GenAI-integrated learning experiences. The study findings highlight the need to rethink conventional assessment goals and methods to capture the full range of learning gains enabled by GenAI. Originality/value While recent guidelines have begun to address GenAI’s role in education, there remains ongoing debate over the foundational principles needed to design meaningful learning and assessment in this new context. The proposed integrated framework offers practical guidance for educators and policymakers while also laying the groundwork for future research on the pedagogical and systemic impacts of GenAI integration.

Information and Learning SciencesVol. 126(7-8)
NSW Department of Education (AU), Deakin University (AU), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), College of Tourism (BG), Oulu University of Applied Sciences (FI), University of Oulu (FI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Online Learning and Analytics
13.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.