When is the best time to test paratuberculosis positivity? Observations from a follow-up study in Hungarian dairy herds

The objective of the present study was to find the most practical combination of diagnostic procedures and time points during lactation to identify <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> ssp. <i>paratuberculosis</i> (MAP)-infected animals. Four Hungarian dairy farms with a 4-5% apparent MAP positivity were enrolled in the study, and 13 non-lactating, known MAP-positive pregnant cows were chosen from each farm. Feces, blood, and milk samples were collected from each cow at 1-5, 10-14, 40-60, 90-120, 180-200, and 280-300 days in milk (DIM) and ELISA and PCR assays were performed for antibody or pathogen detection. Animals that later developed clinical paratuberculosis symptoms showed distinctly different patterns of test positivity than those that did not develop clinical symptoms during the observation period. The optimal time for detecting MAP-positive animals with the highest probability was DIM 40-60 with serum ELISA and DIM 10-14 and 40-60 for PCR assays, respectively. Serum ELISA proved to be slightly more sensitive than milk ELISA. S/P values showed a moderate correlation with the fecal qPCR Ct values. We found that the most suitable period for MAP screening is 40-60 days after calving.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1570915
Primary Topic
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When is the best time to test paratuberculosis positivity? Observations from a follow-up study in Hungarian dairy herds

Johannes Lorenz Khol, Viktor Jurkovich, Walter Baumgartner, Mikolt Bakony et al.
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
article

When is the best time to test paratuberculosis positivity? Observations from a follow-up study in Hungarian dairy herds

Johannes Lorenz Khol, Viktor Jurkovich, Walter Baumgartner, Mikolt Bakony, Kinga Fornyos, Barbara Vass-Bognár
article en

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to find the most practical combination of diagnostic procedures and time points during lactation to identify <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> ssp. <i>paratuberculosis</i> (MAP)-infected animals. Four Hungarian dairy farms with a 4-5% apparent MAP positivity were enrolled in the study, and 13 non-lactating, known MAP-positive pregnant cows were chosen from each farm. Feces, blood, and milk samples were collected from each cow at 1-5, 10-14, 40-60, 90-120, 180-200, and 280-300 days in milk (DIM) and ELISA and PCR assays were performed for antibody or pathogen detection. Animals that later developed clinical paratuberculosis symptoms showed distinctly different patterns of test positivity than those that did not develop clinical symptoms during the observation period. The optimal time for detecting MAP-positive animals with the highest probability was DIM 40-60 with serum ELISA and DIM 10-14 and 40-60 for PCR assays, respectively. Serum ELISA proved to be slightly more sensitive than milk ELISA. S/P values showed a moderate correlation with the fecal qPCR Ct values. We found that the most suitable period for MAP screening is 40-60 days after calving.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 12
Semmelweis University (HU), Animal Welfare Institute (US), University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT), University of Veterinary Medicine (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.