Comparative Evaluations of Deep Learning Models for Diabetic Retinopathy Classification

This study aims to find the best fit algorithm for well-known disease Retinopathy caused by diabetes through a Deep Learning approach on two datasets. Methods: Four Deep Learning methods are employed on the datasets of Diabetic Retinopathy. The methods applied on the grayscale image files. Here, the image files from the dataset are divided into three parts: training- 80%, validation test -10% and test data-10%. We use the following preprocessing techniques to improve model generalization and address issues caused by sparse and unbalanced datasets: resize (aspect ratio), crop, normalize, augment (rotate,zoom,flipping). These techniques replicate realistic variations in retinal images and lessen overfitting. Our goal is to have clean, limited noise and test data to evaluate the model accurately. The dataset has been trained using the following methods: VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3 and EfficientNet correspondingly. Findings: From the above methods on the dataset-1, accuracy found from ResNet50 stood highest and on the dataset-2, accuracy found from Inception-v3 stood highest among the others. Novelty: To test generalizability and robustness, this study compares four significant convolutional neural network architectures for diabetic retinopathy classification across two heterogeneous retinal imaging datasets. Our work explores crossdataset performance, model efficiency and clinically important metrics, providing useful insights for real-world deployment, in contrast to previous studies that were restricted to single-dataset evaluations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.72624
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluations of Deep Learning Models for Diabetic Retinopathy Classification

Shreya Basu, Abhijit Banerjee
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Comparative Evaluations of Deep Learning Models for Diabetic Retinopathy Classification

Shreya Basu, Abhijit Banerjee
article en

Abstract

This study aims to find the best fit algorithm for well-known disease Retinopathy caused by diabetes through a Deep Learning approach on two datasets. Methods: Four Deep Learning methods are employed on the datasets of Diabetic Retinopathy. The methods applied on the grayscale image files. Here, the image files from the dataset are divided into three parts: training- 80%, validation test -10% and test data-10%. We use the following preprocessing techniques to improve model generalization and address issues caused by sparse and unbalanced datasets: resize (aspect ratio), crop, normalize, augment (rotate,zoom,flipping). These techniques replicate realistic variations in retinal images and lessen overfitting. Our goal is to have clean, limited noise and test data to evaluate the model accurately. The dataset has been trained using the following methods: VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3 and EfficientNet correspondingly. Findings: From the above methods on the dataset-1, accuracy found from ResNet50 stood highest and on the dataset-2, accuracy found from Inception-v3 stood highest among the others. Novelty: To test generalizability and robustness, this study compares four significant convolutional neural network architectures for diabetic retinopathy classification across two heterogeneous retinal imaging datasets. Our work explores crossdataset performance, model efficiency and clinically important metrics, providing useful insights for real-world deployment, in contrast to previous studies that were restricted to single-dataset evaluations.

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologyVol. 13(6)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.