Consensus Guideline of Ablation for Metastatic Liver Tumors by Taiwan Academy of Tumor Ablation

Metastatic liver tumors (MLTs) are the most common type of malignant liver tumors, primarily because the liver is a frequent target organ for metastasis. Metastatic cancer is generally considered a systemic disease, so the mainstay of treatment should be systemic therapies, including chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. Currently, it is believed that a multimodal approach, combining local and systemic treatments, can improve tumor control and potentially prolong patient survival. Local treatments, in addition to surgery, include ablation therapy as one of the options. Ablation therapy has its limitations and advantages for local tumor control but can also be combined with other locoregional treatments such as surgical resection, transarterial embolization, and stereotactic body radiotherapy to manage appropriate subsets of patients. Ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma has been performed for many years. In recent years, the number of MLTs cases treated with ablation has been increasing. However, the characteristics of primary liver tumors and MLTs, as well as their responses to ablation therapy, are distinct. At present, there is no established international guideline specifically for the ablation treatment of MLTs. The consensus guidelines developed by the Taiwan Academy of Tumor Ablation (TATA) represent evidence-based medical statements. These guidelines are created and reviewed by an expert team including hepatologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and intervention radiologists through comprehensive medical literature searches, discussions, and voting. The process adheres to evidence-based standards, such as evaluating levels of evidence and grading recommendations. Furthermore, the guidelines are finalized through thorough discussions among all experts and by calculating voting consistency. In cases where clinical evidence is unclear or lacking, expert opinions are also incorporated. Additionally, the guidelines provide recommendations on the future development of ablation therapy for MLTs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Cancer
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000546765
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consensus Guideline of Ablation for Metastatic Liver Tumors by Taiwan Academy of Tumor Ablation

Ming-Feng Chiang, Chao‐Hung Hung, Wei‐Yu Kao, Shen-Yung Wang et al.
2 citations
Liver Cancer
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
2.64
article

Consensus Guideline of Ablation for Metastatic Liver Tumors by Taiwan Academy of Tumor Ablation

Ming-Feng Chiang, Chao‐Hung Hung, Wei‐Yu Kao, Shen-Yung Wang, San‐Chi Chen, Po‐Chin Liang, Ming‐Shun Wu, Chen‐Chun Lin, Chih‐Horng Wu, Shih–Jer Hsu, Hsin‐Lun Lee, Shi‐Ming Lin, Chia-Chi Wang, Po‐Heng Chuang, Ching-Wei Chang, Jen-I Hwang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Metastatic liver tumors (MLTs) are the most common type of malignant liver tumors, primarily because the liver is a frequent target organ for metastasis. Metastatic cancer is generally considered a systemic disease, so the mainstay of treatment should be systemic therapies, including chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. Currently, it is believed that a multimodal approach, combining local and systemic treatments, can improve tumor control and potentially prolong patient survival. Local treatments, in addition to surgery, include ablation therapy as one of the options. Ablation therapy has its limitations and advantages for local tumor control but can also be combined with other locoregional treatments such as surgical resection, transarterial embolization, and stereotactic body radiotherapy to manage appropriate subsets of patients. Ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma has been performed for many years. In recent years, the number of MLTs cases treated with ablation has been increasing. However, the characteristics of primary liver tumors and MLTs, as well as their responses to ablation therapy, are distinct. At present, there is no established international guideline specifically for the ablation treatment of MLTs. The consensus guidelines developed by the Taiwan Academy of Tumor Ablation (TATA) represent evidence-based medical statements. These guidelines are created and reviewed by an expert team including hepatologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and intervention radiologists through comprehensive medical literature searches, discussions, and voting. The process adheres to evidence-based standards, such as evaluating levels of evidence and grading recommendations. Furthermore, the guidelines are finalized through thorough discussions among all experts and by calculating voting consistency. In cases where clinical evidence is unclear or lacking, expert opinions are also incorporated. Additionally, the guidelines provide recommendations on the future development of ablation therapy for MLTs.

Liver CancerVol. 15(1)
National Taiwan University (TW), Chang Gung University (TW), Tzu Chi University (TW), Tzu Chi Foundation (TW), Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital (TW), Jen-Ai Hospital (TW), Taipei Medical University Hospital (TW), Mackay Memorial Hospital (TW), Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Taipei Municipal YangMing Hospital (TW), Mackay Medical University (TW), Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital (TW), Mackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management (TW), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital (TW), Wan Fang Hospital (TW), Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation (US), Taipei Medical University (TW), Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
National Science and Technology Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
2.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.