MPC-based postural control: Mimicking CNS strategies for head–neck stabilization under eyes closed conditions

A plausible explanation about the acquisition and realization of beliefs by the central nervous system (CNS) when issuing control actions to counteract external perturbations, is to employ mechanisms aiming to minimize sensory conflict and muscle effort while maintaining biomechanical stability. However, existing head–neck postural control models fail to explicitly integrate this plausible CNS objective within their stabilization mechanisms. This study proposes a novel Model Predictive Control (MPC)-based framework to replicate CNS postural stabilization by incorporating the minimization of sensory conflict as a primary control objective through the MPC cost function. The MPC is integrated in a simplified biomechanical head–neck structure, using a prediction model and sensory feedback to optimize control actions over a finite time horizon within biomechanical constraints. Two human experiments measuring head motion with unpredictable seat and trunk perturbations were used to evaluate and validate different configurations of sensory feedback pathways. During anterior–posterior translational trunk perturbations, the results illustrated that the configuration with vestibular feedback improved head position prediction while muscle effort and partial somatosensory feedback alone, achieved superior results in head pitch prediction. Meanwhile, muscle effort and partial somatosensory feedback were sufficient to stabilize the head during trunk rotational (pitch) perturbations. Finally, a multi-scenario optimization demonstrated that a single set of MPC weights could generalize stabilization across both perturbation types. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of MPC in replicating CNS-inspired postural adjustments, indicating that controlling a simplified biomechanical head–neck model provides a computationally efficient and accurate alternative to complex multi-segment approaches. • First MPC-based control to replicate head–neck postural stabilization. • Modeled CNS plausible objectives of minimizing sensory conflict using the MPC cost function. • Validated model with experimental data for two perturbation types under eyes-closed tests. • Outperformed complex multi-segment models in efficiency without compromising stability performance. • Unified MPC weights stabilized the model across anterior–posterior and pitch perturbations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Control Engineering Practice
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106428
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MPC-based postural control: Mimicking CNS strategies for head–neck stabilization under eyes closed conditions

Riender Happee, Chrysovalanto Messiou, Γεώργιος Παπαϊωάννου
1 citations
Control Engineering Practice
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
2.01
article

MPC-based postural control: Mimicking CNS strategies for head–neck stabilization under eyes closed conditions

Riender Happee, Chrysovalanto Messiou, Γεώργιος Παπαϊωάννου
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A plausible explanation about the acquisition and realization of beliefs by the central nervous system (CNS) when issuing control actions to counteract external perturbations, is to employ mechanisms aiming to minimize sensory conflict and muscle effort while maintaining biomechanical stability. However, existing head–neck postural control models fail to explicitly integrate this plausible CNS objective within their stabilization mechanisms. This study proposes a novel Model Predictive Control (MPC)-based framework to replicate CNS postural stabilization by incorporating the minimization of sensory conflict as a primary control objective through the MPC cost function. The MPC is integrated in a simplified biomechanical head–neck structure, using a prediction model and sensory feedback to optimize control actions over a finite time horizon within biomechanical constraints. Two human experiments measuring head motion with unpredictable seat and trunk perturbations were used to evaluate and validate different configurations of sensory feedback pathways. During anterior–posterior translational trunk perturbations, the results illustrated that the configuration with vestibular feedback improved head position prediction while muscle effort and partial somatosensory feedback alone, achieved superior results in head pitch prediction. Meanwhile, muscle effort and partial somatosensory feedback were sufficient to stabilize the head during trunk rotational (pitch) perturbations. Finally, a multi-scenario optimization demonstrated that a single set of MPC weights could generalize stabilization across both perturbation types. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of MPC in replicating CNS-inspired postural adjustments, indicating that controlling a simplified biomechanical head–neck model provides a computationally efficient and accurate alternative to complex multi-segment approaches. • First MPC-based control to replicate head–neck postural stabilization. • Modeled CNS plausible objectives of minimizing sensory conflict using the MPC cost function. • Validated model with experimental data for two perturbation types under eyes-closed tests. • Outperformed complex multi-segment models in efficiency without compromising stability performance. • Unified MPC weights stabilized the model across anterior–posterior and pitch perturbations.

Control Engineering PracticeVol. 164
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.