Social cognition and driving: Theory of mind is associated with drivers’ hazard perception

• Are social-cognitive factors associated with an individual’s crash risk? • Driving style (following distance) and skill (hazard perception) predict crash risk. • Here found no relationship between empathic concern and following distance. • But found that theory of mind correlated with hazard perception skill performance. • This shows that social-cognitive factors may be relevant to crash risk. For many, driving enables participation in different aspects of life. However, crashes can incur substantial personal and economic burdens. There has been ample research documenting the cognitive factors that predict crash risk (e.g., attention). However, a large part of driving involves interaction with other road users. This means that social-cognitive factors may also be implicated in crash risk. Here, in a sample of N = 120 young adult drivers, we measured important aspects of driver skill (hazard perception) and driving style (following distance), which predict crash risk, and tested their association with two novel social-cognitive variables: (1) theory of mind (for hazard perception), and (2) empathic concern (for following distance). Empathic concern was not associated with following distance. However, individuals’ theory of mind was associated with their hazard perception skill performance. This highlights that social-cognitive factors can be associated with crash risk and demonstrates the potentially far-reaching consequences of drivers’ theory of mind for road-user safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.017
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social cognition and driving: Theory of mind is associated with drivers’ hazard perception

Cheuk‐Sing Choy, Philippa Neary, Mark S. Horswill, Mark Edwards et al.
2 citations
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Traffic and Road Safety
2.61
article

Social cognition and driving: Theory of mind is associated with drivers’ hazard perception

Cheuk‐Sing Choy, Philippa Neary, Mark S. Horswill, Mark Edwards, Andrew Hill, Stephanie C. Goodhew
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Are social-cognitive factors associated with an individual’s crash risk? • Driving style (following distance) and skill (hazard perception) predict crash risk. • Here found no relationship between empathic concern and following distance. • But found that theory of mind correlated with hazard perception skill performance. • This shows that social-cognitive factors may be relevant to crash risk. For many, driving enables participation in different aspects of life. However, crashes can incur substantial personal and economic burdens. There has been ample research documenting the cognitive factors that predict crash risk (e.g., attention). However, a large part of driving involves interaction with other road users. This means that social-cognitive factors may also be implicated in crash risk. Here, in a sample of N = 120 young adult drivers, we measured important aspects of driver skill (hazard perception) and driving style (following distance), which predict crash risk, and tested their association with two novel social-cognitive variables: (1) theory of mind (for hazard perception), and (2) empathic concern (for following distance). Empathic concern was not associated with following distance. However, individuals’ theory of mind was associated with their hazard perception skill performance. This highlights that social-cognitive factors can be associated with crash risk and demonstrates the potentially far-reaching consequences of drivers’ theory of mind for road-user safety.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 114
Australian National University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Traffic and Road Safety
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.