Comparative Analysis of Three Staining Techniques for Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Biopsy Samples: A Referral University Hospital

Background: Liver fibrosis is a progressive condition characterized by excessive deposition of extracellular matrix components, particularly collagen and elastic fibers, leading to impaired liver function. Accurate histological staging of fibrosis is essential for diagnosis, prognosis, and management. While hematoxylin and eosin (H and E), Masson’s trichrome (MT), and orcein (OR) stains are commonly used for fibrosis assessment, their comparative efficiency and correlation in routine practice remain inadequately defined. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 76 archived liver biopsy samples from patients referred to Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran, between 2021 and 2023. All samples underwent H and E, MT, and OR staining. Fibrosis staging was performed using the Ishak scoring system by experienced pathologists. Statistical analysis, including Fisher’s exact test, was used to assess the correlation and agreement between staining methods, with P values < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Among the 76 patients (34.2% male, mean age 41.2 years), the highest frequency of fibrosis detection occurred at Stage 2 for MT (35.5%) and at Stage 3 for OR (23.7%). Significant differences were observed between H and E and MT ( P < 0.001), and between MT and OR ( P = 0.006) in fibrosis staging. The greatest discrepancy between MT and OR was at Stage 2 ( P = 0.003). Notably, OR staining often showed a lower stage compared to MT (36.8% of cases), while in 23.7% of cases, OR indicated a higher stage. Gender and age group analyses revealed significant differences between MT and OR in males ( P = 0.036) and patients aged 0–32 years ( P = 0.032). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that MT and OR staining methods provide complementary information in the assessment of liver fibrosis. The significant discrepancies observed, especially at intermediate stages, suggest that incorporating OR staining alongside MT enhances diagnostic accuracy. Routine use of both stains is recommended for comprehensive fibrosis evaluation in liver biopsies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal (BBRJ)
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_136_25
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Three Staining Techniques for Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Biopsy Samples: A Referral University Hospital

Mahdieh Fahimi, Zhaleh Mohsenifar, Amirhassan Rabbani, Behzad Hatami et al.
1 citations
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal (BBRJ)
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
1.35
article

Comparative Analysis of Three Staining Techniques for Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Biopsy Samples: A Referral University Hospital

Mahdieh Fahimi, Zhaleh Mohsenifar, Amirhassan Rabbani, Behzad Hatami, Mahsa setayeshfar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Liver fibrosis is a progressive condition characterized by excessive deposition of extracellular matrix components, particularly collagen and elastic fibers, leading to impaired liver function. Accurate histological staging of fibrosis is essential for diagnosis, prognosis, and management. While hematoxylin and eosin (H and E), Masson’s trichrome (MT), and orcein (OR) stains are commonly used for fibrosis assessment, their comparative efficiency and correlation in routine practice remain inadequately defined. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 76 archived liver biopsy samples from patients referred to Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran, between 2021 and 2023. All samples underwent H and E, MT, and OR staining. Fibrosis staging was performed using the Ishak scoring system by experienced pathologists. Statistical analysis, including Fisher’s exact test, was used to assess the correlation and agreement between staining methods, with P values < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Among the 76 patients (34.2% male, mean age 41.2 years), the highest frequency of fibrosis detection occurred at Stage 2 for MT (35.5%) and at Stage 3 for OR (23.7%). Significant differences were observed between H and E and MT ( P < 0.001), and between MT and OR ( P = 0.006) in fibrosis staging. The greatest discrepancy between MT and OR was at Stage 2 ( P = 0.003). Notably, OR staining often showed a lower stage compared to MT (36.8% of cases), while in 23.7% of cases, OR indicated a higher stage. Gender and age group analyses revealed significant differences between MT and OR in males ( P = 0.036) and patients aged 0–32 years ( P = 0.032). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that MT and OR staining methods provide complementary information in the assessment of liver fibrosis. The significant discrepancies observed, especially at intermediate stages, suggest that incorporating OR staining alongside MT enhances diagnostic accuracy. Routine use of both stains is recommended for comprehensive fibrosis evaluation in liver biopsies.

Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal (BBRJ)Vol. 9(2)
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.