Neo-Russellian Abstractionism

A central thesis of neo-Fregean abstractionism is that numerical expressions of the form 'the number of <i>F</i>s', introduced by Hume's Principle, should be read as genuine singular terms whose semantic function is to refer to particular objects. This paper explores the prospects of a variant of abstractionism in which such expressions have existential assertoric content, as in Russell's analysis of definite descriptions. The neo-Russellian abstractionist faces three initial challenges: (i) the Russellian rendering of Hume's Principle does not retain the ontological modesty that any admissible abstraction principle must respect. (ii) It defuses the objectual character of natural numbers, and thereby fails to ground their infinity. And (iii) it does not involve the means for engaging in identifying reference to numbers as particular objects, thereby constituting a derogation of arithmetical platonism. I shall investigate these challenges and propose solutions to address them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Erkenntnis
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-025-00970-4
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neo-Russellian Abstractionism

Bahram Assadian
Erkenntnis
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

Neo-Russellian Abstractionism

Bahram Assadian
article en

Abstract

A central thesis of neo-Fregean abstractionism is that numerical expressions of the form 'the number of <i>F</i>s', introduced by Hume's Principle, should be read as genuine singular terms whose semantic function is to refer to particular objects. This paper explores the prospects of a variant of abstractionism in which such expressions have existential assertoric content, as in Russell's analysis of definite descriptions. The neo-Russellian abstractionist faces three initial challenges: (i) the Russellian rendering of Hume's Principle does not retain the ontological modesty that any admissible abstraction principle must respect. (ii) It defuses the objectual character of natural numbers, and thereby fails to ground their infinity. And (iii) it does not involve the means for engaging in identifying reference to numbers as particular objects, thereby constituting a derogation of arithmetical platonism. I shall investigate these challenges and propose solutions to address them.

ErkenntnisVol. 91(4)
University of Leeds (GB)
Government of the United Kingdom, UK Research and Innovation, King's College London, National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Neo-Russellian Abstractionism — Bahram Assadian · Erkenntnis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS