Flow-Label Trends in IPv6 Traffic: A 9-Year Analysis of a Dataset Collected in Japan

RFC 6437 introduces the 20-bit flow label field in the IPv6 header and recommends it to be used alongside source and destination IP addresses for efficient flow classification. A recent paper from Google authors explains how they have begun to use this field in their IPv6 network to select an alternative path, thereby preventing congestion or outages. However, there is no prior research investigating whether connections make use of this field on the Internet. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of the 9-year MAWI dataset (2016-2024), the Internet traces gathered from a large backbone link in Japan, and examine whether the IPv6 flow label is indeed employed on the Internet. Our findings reveal an increasing upward trend in the adoption of the flow label field. In particular, this trend correlates with the use of QUIC, whose specification—different from TCP—explicitly repeats the recommendation to utilize the flow label.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/hpsr64165.2025.11038848
Primary Topic
IPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flow-Label Trends in IPv6 Traffic: A 9-Year Analysis of a Dataset Collected in Japan

Mahmudul Hasan, Khondaker M. Salehin, Eiji Oki, Safiqul Islam et al.
IPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
article

Flow-Label Trends in IPv6 Traffic: A 9-Year Analysis of a Dataset Collected in Japan

Mahmudul Hasan, Khondaker M. Salehin, Eiji Oki, Safiqul Islam, Michael Welzl, Boning Feng, Abdul A. Khan
article en

Abstract

RFC 6437 introduces the 20-bit flow label field in the IPv6 header and recommends it to be used alongside source and destination IP addresses for efficient flow classification. A recent paper from Google authors explains how they have begun to use this field in their IPv6 network to select an alternative path, thereby preventing congestion or outages. However, there is no prior research investigating whether connections make use of this field on the Internet. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of the 9-year MAWI dataset (2016-2024), the Internet traces gathered from a large backbone link in Japan, and examine whether the IPv6 flow label is indeed employed on the Internet. Our findings reveal an increasing upward trend in the adoption of the flow label field. In particular, this trend correlates with the use of QUIC, whose specification—different from TCP—explicitly repeats the recommendation to utilize the flow label.

OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Kyoto University (JP), Comilla University (BD), University of Portland (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
IPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.