“The Trust in AI-Mix: Technical, Legal and Ethical Requirements as well as Psychology”

The increasing spread of artificial intelligence (AI) applications underscores the necessity for an interdisciplinary initiative to ensure the trustworthiness of AI and its alignment to human values and security. A distinction is made between trustworthy AI and trust in AI. The former is defined by adherence to ethical, technical, and legal standards and describes an implementation perspective. The latter reflects a psychological perspective and focuses on the perception of users. For the implementation of trustworthy AI, ethical guidelines from institutions and companies, technical challenges in terms of explainability, robustness, and bias avoidance, and legal requirements are discussed. The user perspective is considered in two respects; first drawing from implementation guidelines provided by the human-centered AI approach. Second, while focusing on the perceptual perspective of trust in AI, findings of developmental psychology, cognitive science, and human–computer interaction are discussed. By connecting technical implementation, ethical and legal requirements, as well as psychological insights, we propose a comprehensive and holistic "trust-in-AI mix" to guide the development of AI systems that foster user trust in AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/percomworkshops65533.2025.00068
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The Trust in AI-Mix: Technical, Legal and Ethical Requirements as well as Psychology”

Jan Spilski, Thomas Lachmann, Anja Spilski
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

“The Trust in AI-Mix: Technical, Legal and Ethical Requirements as well as Psychology”

Jan Spilski, Thomas Lachmann, Anja Spilski
article en

Abstract

The increasing spread of artificial intelligence (AI) applications underscores the necessity for an interdisciplinary initiative to ensure the trustworthiness of AI and its alignment to human values and security. A distinction is made between trustworthy AI and trust in AI. The former is defined by adherence to ethical, technical, and legal standards and describes an implementation perspective. The latter reflects a psychological perspective and focuses on the perception of users. For the implementation of trustworthy AI, ethical guidelines from institutions and companies, technical challenges in terms of explainability, robustness, and bias avoidance, and legal requirements are discussed. The user perspective is considered in two respects; first drawing from implementation guidelines provided by the human-centered AI approach. Second, while focusing on the perceptual perspective of trust in AI, findings of developmental psychology, cognitive science, and human–computer interaction are discussed. By connecting technical implementation, ethical and legal requirements, as well as psychological insights, we propose a comprehensive and holistic "trust-in-AI mix" to guide the development of AI systems that foster user trust in AI.

University of Kaiserslautern (DE), Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Koblenz and Landau (DE), Universidad Nebrija (ES), Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.