Semantic Highlighting: Visual Guidance in Multimodal Gaze-Keyboard-Based Interaction

Modern video-based eye trackers have reached a level of accuracy sufficient for gaze-based human-computer interaction. In many but not all applications, accuracy even allows for replacing a computer mouse with gaze-based pointing. The Multi-Modal Interaction Concept for Efficient Input (M<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>ice) tackles accuracy problems with an on-demand hybrid linear-fisheye magnifier. This paper explores how semantic analysis of screen content can be used as part of an alternative solution to the accuracy problem. This solution integrates machine-learning-based near real-time image analysis into the M<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>ice interaction concept and adds semantic highlighting to screen elements near the user's interaction point of gaze. Semantic highlighting identifies clickable screen elements and adds a number as well as a bounding box to each of these elements. This allows users to select elements with a keystroke. It thus combines visual magnification with visual semantic enrichment. The image analysis is based on a machine learning model specifically trained for the respective use case. A user study <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(\mathrm{n}=20)$</tex> showed no significant speed difference with the use of semantic highlighting but a 94.3 % decrease in interaction errors (misclicks) with the use of semantic highlighting compared to the traditional selection and magnification approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icsc64641.2025.00017
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Semantic Highlighting: Visual Guidance in Multimodal Gaze-Keyboard-Based Interaction

Robert Mertens, Constantin A. Rothkopf, Anna Kiel, Florian Eggenkemper et al.
2 citations
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
3.87
article

Semantic Highlighting: Visual Guidance in Multimodal Gaze-Keyboard-Based Interaction

Robert Mertens, Constantin A. Rothkopf, Anna Kiel, Florian Eggenkemper, Nils Sontowski, Luca Feldmann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Modern video-based eye trackers have reached a level of accuracy sufficient for gaze-based human-computer interaction. In many but not all applications, accuracy even allows for replacing a computer mouse with gaze-based pointing. The Multi-Modal Interaction Concept for Efficient Input (M<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>ice) tackles accuracy problems with an on-demand hybrid linear-fisheye magnifier. This paper explores how semantic analysis of screen content can be used as part of an alternative solution to the accuracy problem. This solution integrates machine-learning-based near real-time image analysis into the M<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>ice interaction concept and adds semantic highlighting to screen elements near the user's interaction point of gaze. Semantic highlighting identifies clickable screen elements and adds a number as well as a bounding box to each of these elements. This allows users to select elements with a keystroke. It thus combines visual magnification with visual semantic enrichment. The image analysis is based on a machine learning model specifically trained for the respective use case. A user study <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(\mathrm{n}=20)$</tex> showed no significant speed difference with the use of semantic highlighting but a 94.3 % decrease in interaction errors (misclicks) with the use of semantic highlighting compared to the traditional selection and magnification approaches.

Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Hochschule Weserbergland (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.