Improved Iterative CD-Spline Approach for Building Boundary Regularization Using Airborne LiDAR Data
Building boundary regularization/modeling is an important task in urban mapping using remote sensing data for contour representation. In the previous Iterative Changeable Degree Spline (ICDS) approach, it was noticed that contour regularization can be affected by the selection of critical points (corner points), responsible for identifying the end points of each contour segment. In the ICDS strategy, critical points are detected using Douglas–Peucker algorithm followed by an angle-based constraint; then, a single set of critical points is used in a regularization process, not being possible to guarantee that the derived result corresponds to the best contour model. To overcome this limitation, we proposed the Improved Iterative Changeable Degree Spline (IICDS) that consists of testing several critical point configurations, resulting in multiple contour models for each building. In the proposed strategy, the optimal contour is automatically selected by evaluating the number of critical points and minimizing the distance between the initially extracted and regularized contours. In the experiments, two airborne LiDAR datasets acquired in different urban environments were utilized. Obtained results indicated the potential of the IICDS approach for simple and complex contours, presenting Fscore and positional accuracy around 95% and 0.3 m, respectively.
Authors
- Maurício Galo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-9960)
- Ayman Habib (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6498-5951)
- Renato César dos Santos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0263-312X)
Institutions
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2025.3581438
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.80